[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Update whitelist support for new hardware (rev2)
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Jun 18 16:33:49 UTC 2019
On 18/06/2019 02:50, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Update whitelist support for new hardware (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/62076/
> State : success
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6289 -> Patchwork_13319
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **SUCCESS**
>
> No regressions found.
>
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/
>
> Known issues
> ------------
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_13319 that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Issues hit ####
>
> * igt at gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices:
> - fi-blb-e6850: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] ([fdo#107718])
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6289/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
>
>
> #### Possible fixes ####
>
> * igt at gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
> - fi-icl-y: [INCOMPLETE][3] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#109100]) -> [PASS][4]
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6289/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
>
> * igt at gem_exec_create@basic:
> - fi-icl-u2: [INCOMPLETE][5] ([fdo#107713]) -> [PASS][6]
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6289/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
>
> * igt at kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
> - fi-kbl-7500u: [FAIL][7] ([fdo#109485]) -> [PASS][8]
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6289/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
>
> * igt at kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
> - fi-hsw-peppy: [DMESG-WARN][9] ([fdo#102614]) -> [PASS][10]
> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6289/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
>
> * igt at prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
> - fi-ilk-650: [DMESG-WARN][11] ([fdo#106387]) -> [PASS][12]
> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6289/fi-ilk-650/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html
> [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13319/fi-ilk-650/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html
>
>
> [fdo#102614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
> [fdo#106387]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106387
> [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
> [fdo#107718]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107718
> [fdo#109100]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109100
> [fdo#109485]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109485
>
>
> Participating hosts (43 -> 35)
> ------------------------------
>
> Additional (1): fi-icl-u3
> Missing (9): fi-kbl-soraka fi-ilk-m540 fi-bsw-n3050 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper fi-pnv-d510 fi-icl-dsi fi-bdw-samus
>
>
> Build changes
> -------------
>
> * Linux: CI_DRM_6289 -> Patchwork_13319
>
> CI_DRM_6289: 897314e20de3b565ab91637f69817ebeddde07ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> IGT_5059: 1f67ee0d09d6513f487f2be74aae9700e755258a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
> Patchwork_13319: c69779fec5decc771ea5ab064964b8e4065de760 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>
>
> == Linux commits ==
>
> c69779fec5de drm/i915: Update workarounds selftest for read only regs
> 3734e4d0d4cc drm/i915: Add whitelist workarounds for ICL
> 4d5289caa541 drm/i915: Support whitelist workarounds on all engines
> 09c357e609ef drm/i915: Support flags in whitlist WAs
I have pushed this but now I ask for the read-only whitelist selftest to
be written really ASAP.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list