[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-06-20 09:13:27)
> Quoting Patchwork (2019-06-20 09:09:33)
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/62431/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6312 -> Patchwork_13359
> > ====================================================
> > 
> > Summary
> > -------
> > 
> >   **FAILURE**
> > 
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_13359 absolutely need to be
> >   verified manually.
> >   
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_13359, please notify your bug team to allow them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> > 
> >   External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13359/
> > 
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> > 
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_13359:
> > 
> > ### IGT changes ###
> > 
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> > 
> >   * igt at i915_module_load@reload:
> >     - fi-kbl-r:           [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
> >    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6312/fi-kbl-r/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
> >    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13359/fi-kbl-r/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
> >     - fi-whl-u:           [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
> >    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6312/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
> >    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13359/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
> >     - fi-skl-guc:         [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
> >    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6312/fi-skl-guc/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
> >    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13359/fi-skl-guc/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
> 
> Hmm, new asserts firing. More than likely a bug in the assert or a
> latent issue. Still scary.

Nah, seems to be a slight misfire on the assert. It is asserting that
the engine is still alive as we process the final request made to put it
to asleep. Will need a new assert.
-Chris