[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/icl: Add new supported CD clocks

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:36:57AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 14:48 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 03:50:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> > wrote:
> > > Now 180, 172.8 and 192 MHz are supported.
> > > 
> > > 180 and 172.8 MHz CD clocks will only be used when audio is not
> > > enabled as state by BSpec and implemented in
> > > intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(), CD clock must be at least twice of
> > > Azalia BCLK and BCLK by default is 96 MHz, it could be set to 48
> > > MHz
> > > but we are not reading it.
> > > 
> > > BSpec: 20598
> > > BSpec: 15729
> > > Cc: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 29 +++++++++++++++---
> > > ----
> > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > index 8993ab283562..d560e25d3fb5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > > @@ -1756,9 +1756,10 @@ static void cnl_sanitize_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >  
> > >  static int icl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk, unsigned int ref)
> > >  {
> > > -	int ranges_24[] = { 312000, 552000, 648000 };
> > > -	int ranges_19_38[] = { 307200, 556800, 652800 };
> > > -	int *ranges;
> > > +	const int ranges_24[] = { 180000, 192000, 312000, 552000,
> > > 648000 };
> > > +	const int ranges_19_38[] = { 172800, 192000, 307200, 556800,
> > > 652800 };
> > 
> > static?
> 
> We don't need to keep this in memory all the time.

It'll be in memory either way. It's going to end up
as either text or bss. bss seems better.

> 
> > 
> > > +	const int *ranges;
> > > +	unsigned int len, i;
> > 
> > just 'int' please
> 
> Ok
> 
> > 
> > >  
> > >  	switch (ref) {
> > >  	default:
> > > @@ -1766,19 +1767,22 @@ static int icl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk,
> > > unsigned int ref)
> > >  		/* fall through */
> > >  	case 24000:
> > >  		ranges = ranges_24;
> > > +		len = ARRAY_SIZE(ranges_24);
> > >  		break;
> > >  	case 19200:
> > >  	case 38400:
> > >  		ranges = ranges_19_38;
> > > +		len = ARRAY_SIZE(ranges_19_38);
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (min_cdclk > ranges[1])
> > > -		return ranges[2];
> > > -	else if (min_cdclk > ranges[0])
> > > -		return ranges[1];
> > > -	else
> > > -		return ranges[0];
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> > > +		if (min_cdclk <= ranges[i])
> > > +			return ranges[i];
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	WARN_ON(min_cdclk > ranges[len - 1]);
> > > +	return ranges[len - 1];
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static int icl_calc_cdclk_pll_vco(struct drm_i915_private
> > > *dev_priv, int cdclk)
> > > @@ -1792,16 +1796,23 @@ static int icl_calc_cdclk_pll_vco(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk)
> > >  	default:
> > >  		MISSING_CASE(cdclk);
> > >  		/* fall through */
> > > +	case 172800:
> > >  	case 307200:
> > >  	case 556800:
> > >  	case 652800:
> > >  		WARN_ON(dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref != 19200 &&
> > >  			dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref != 38400);
> > >  		break;
> > > +	case 180000:
> > >  	case 312000:
> > >  	case 552000:
> > >  	case 648000:
> > >  		WARN_ON(dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref != 24000);
> > > +		break;
> > > +	case 192000:
> > > +		WARN_ON(dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref != 19200 &&
> > > +			dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref != 38400 &&
> > > +			dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref != 24000);
> > 
> > I'd probably put a break here too for symmetry.
> 
> Ok
> 
> > 
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	ratio = cdclk / (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref / 2);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.22.0
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel