[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915/perf: implement active wait for noa configurations
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Jun 27 08:27:57 UTC 2019
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-06-27 09:00:39)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 2f1dc9be3bfb..b2f5ba87921c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,8 @@ static int alloc_oa_config_buffer(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> size_t config_length = 0;
> u32 *cs;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
What inside *this* function depends on the struct_mutex? The noa_wait
vma is already pinned and I didn't spot anything else added that might
be contentious.
> if (oa_config->mux_regs_len > 0) {
> config_length += DIV_ROUND_UP(oa_config->mux_regs_len,
> MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM_MAX_REGS) * 4;
> @@ -425,7 +427,7 @@ static int alloc_oa_config_buffer(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM_MAX_REGS) * 4;
> config_length += oa_config->flex_regs_len * 8;
> }
> - config_length += 4; /* MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END */
> + config_length += 12; /* MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START into noa_wait loop */
> config_length = ALIGN(config_length, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE);
>
> bo = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(i915, config_length);
> @@ -442,7 +444,12 @@ static int alloc_oa_config_buffer(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> cs = write_cs_mi_lri(cs, oa_config->b_counter_regs, oa_config->b_counter_regs_len);
> cs = write_cs_mi_lri(cs, oa_config->flex_regs, oa_config->flex_regs_len);
>
> - *cs++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> +
> + /* Jump into the NOA wait busy loop. */
> + *cs++ = (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 8 ?
> + MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START : MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START_GEN8);
> + *cs++ = i915->perf.oa.noa_wait->node.start;
i915_ggtt_offset(i915->perf.oa.noa_wait);
double checks that you are in the ggtt and so assuming u32 is valid.
This is operating inside the user context right? (If I remember
correctly, you plug into the user dispatch) If so, where do you save and
restore the CS_GPR overwritten?
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list