[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib: Add --skip-crc-compare option
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 27 16:05:17 UTC 2019
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 03:32:50PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:34:21PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > When using --interactive-debug, it's sometimes desirable to ignore CRC
> > mismatches and let the test proceed as if they passed so that the
> > on-screen outcome can be inspected. Let's add a debug option to allow
> > this.
> >
> > Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/igt_core.c | 7 +++++++
> > lib/igt_core.h | 1 +
> > lib/igt_debugfs.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.c b/lib/igt_core.c
> > index 71b05d3b..5523950f 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_core.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_core.c
> > @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@
> >
> > static unsigned int exit_handler_count;
> > const char *igt_interactive_debug;
> > +bool igt_skip_crc_compare;
> >
> > /* subtests helpers */
> > static bool list_subtests = false;
> > @@ -285,6 +286,7 @@ enum {
> > OPT_DESCRIPTION,
> > OPT_DEBUG,
> > OPT_INTERACTIVE_DEBUG,
> > + OPT_SKIP_CRC,
> > OPT_HELP = 'h'
> > };
> >
> > @@ -552,6 +554,7 @@ static void print_usage(const char *help_str, bool output_on_stderr)
> > " --run-subtest <pattern>\n"
> > " --debug[=log-domain]\n"
> > " --interactive-debug[=domain]\n"
> > + " --skip-crc-compare\n"
> > " --help-description\n"
> > " --help\n");
> > if (help_str)
> > @@ -668,6 +671,7 @@ static int common_init(int *argc, char **argv,
> > {"help-description", 0, 0, OPT_DESCRIPTION},
> > {"debug", optional_argument, 0, OPT_DEBUG},
> > {"interactive-debug", optional_argument, 0, OPT_INTERACTIVE_DEBUG},
> > + {"skip-crc-compare", 0, 0, OPT_SKIP_CRC},
> > {"help", 0, 0, OPT_HELP},
> > {0, 0, 0, 0}
> > };
> > @@ -768,6 +772,9 @@ static int common_init(int *argc, char **argv,
> > print_test_description();
> > ret = -1;
> > goto out;
> > + case OPT_SKIP_CRC:
> > + igt_skip_crc_compare = true;
> > + goto out;
> > case OPT_HELP:
> > print_usage(help_str, false);
> > ret = -1;
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.h b/lib/igt_core.h
> > index 47ffd9e7..f12fc5cb 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_core.h
> > +++ b/lib/igt_core.h
> > @@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ bool igt_run_in_simulation(void);
> > void igt_skip_on_simulation(void);
> >
> > extern const char *igt_interactive_debug;
> > +extern bool igt_skip_crc_compare;
> >
> > /**
> > * igt_log_level:
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_debugfs.c b/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > index 640c78e9..04d1648b 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > @@ -405,6 +405,12 @@ static bool igt_find_crc_mismatch(const igt_crc_t *a, const igt_crc_t *b,
> > * assert that CRCs match, never that they are different. Otherwise there might
> > * be random testcase failures when different screen contents end up with the
> > * same CRC by chance.
> > + *
> > + * Passing --skip-crc-compare on the command line will force this function
> > + * to always pass, which can be useful in interactive debugging where you
> > + * might know the test will fail, but still want the test to keep going as if
> > + * it had succeeded so that you can see the on-screen behavior.
> > + *
> > */
> > void igt_assert_crc_equal(const igt_crc_t *a, const igt_crc_t *b)
> > {
> > @@ -416,7 +422,7 @@ void igt_assert_crc_equal(const igt_crc_t *a, const igt_crc_t *b)
> > igt_debug("CRC mismatch at index %d: 0x%x != 0x%x\n", index,
> > a->crc[index], b->crc[index]);
> >
> > - igt_assert(!mismatch);
> > + igt_assert(!mismatch || igt_skip_crc_compare);
>
> I think an igt_debug line here could be useful when we skip the assert.
> With that
Daniel, is the debug print just above not sufficient? Or would you like
a more explicit indication that we skipped the assert even though there
was mismatch?
I guess we could do something like:
if (mismatch)
igt_debug("CRC mismatch%s at index %d: 0x%x != 0x%x\n",
skip_crc_compare ? " (ignored)" : "",
index, a->crc[index], b->crc[index]);
to avoid spamming the log with two lines per mismatch?
I was just looking for this knob until I realized we never applied this
patch :/
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>
> aka Ville convinced me.
> -Daniel
>
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.14.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list