[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/37] drm/i915/selftests: don't just test CACHE_NONE for huge-pages

[Matthew Auld]

We also want to test LLC.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
index 1cdf98b7535e..1862bf06a20f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ huge_pages_object(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 		  unsigned int page_mask)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	unsigned int cache_level;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!size);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(size, BIT(__ffs(page_mask))));
@@ -171,7 +172,9 @@ huge_pages_object(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 
 	obj->write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
 	obj->read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
-	obj->cache_level = I915_CACHE_NONE;
+
+	cache_level = HAS_LLC(i915) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;
+	i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
 
 	obj->mm.page_mask = page_mask;
 
-- 
2.20.1