[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Store DIMM rank information as a number
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Mar 4 16:17:50 UTC 2019
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Life will be easier later if we have the ranks stored
> as a bare number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 92 +++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 ++--
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index c6354f6cdbdb..48c6bc44072d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1068,28 +1068,28 @@ static void intel_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_gvt_sanitize_options(dev_priv);
> }
>
> -static enum dram_rank skl_get_dimm_rank(u8 size, u32 rank)
> +static int skl_get_dimm_ranks(u8 size, u32 rank)
> {
> if (size == 0)
> - return I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> + return 0;
> if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> - return I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> + return 1;
> else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> - return I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> + return 2;
>
> - return I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static bool
> -skl_is_16gb_dimm(enum dram_rank rank, u8 size, u8 width)
> +skl_is_16gb_dimm(u8 ranks, u8 size, u8 width)
> {
> - if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE && width == 8 && size == 16)
> + if (ranks == 1 && width == 8 && size == 16)
> return true;
> - else if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL && width == 8 && size == 32)
> + else if (ranks == 2 && width == 8 && size == 32)
> return true;
> - else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE && width == 16 && size == 8)
> + else if (ranks == 1 && width == 16 && size == 8)
> return true;
> - else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL && width == 16 && size == 16)
> + else if (ranks == 2 && width == 16 && size == 16)
> return true;
>
> return false;
> @@ -1120,28 +1120,24 @@ skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info *ch, u32 val)
>
> tmp_l = val & SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
> tmp_s = s_val & SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
> - ch->l_info.rank = skl_get_dimm_rank(ch->l_info.size, tmp_l);
> - ch->s_info.rank = skl_get_dimm_rank(ch->s_info.size, tmp_s);
> -
> - if (ch->l_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL ||
> - ch->s_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> - ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> - else if (ch->l_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE &&
> - ch->s_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> - ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> + ch->l_info.ranks = skl_get_dimm_ranks(ch->l_info.size, tmp_l);
> + ch->s_info.ranks = skl_get_dimm_ranks(ch->s_info.size, tmp_s);
> +
> + if (ch->l_info.ranks == 2 || ch->s_info.ranks == 2)
> + ch->ranks = 2;
> + else if (ch->l_info.ranks == 1 && ch->s_info.ranks == 1)
> + ch->ranks = 2;
> else
> - ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> + ch->ranks = 1;
>
> - ch->is_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->l_info.rank, ch->l_info.size,
> + ch->is_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->l_info.ranks, ch->l_info.size,
> ch->l_info.width) ||
> - skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->s_info.rank, ch->s_info.size,
> + skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->s_info.ranks, ch->s_info.size,
> ch->s_info.width);
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("(size:width:rank) L(%dGB:X%d:%s) S(%dGB:X%d:%s)\n",
> - ch->l_info.size, ch->l_info.width,
> - ch->l_info.rank ? "dual" : "single",
> - ch->s_info.size, ch->s_info.width,
> - ch->s_info.rank ? "dual" : "single");
I don't understand how the above ternary operators could ever have
produced the right results before.
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("(size:width:ranks) L(%dGB:X%d:%d) S(%dGB:X%d:%d)\n",
> + ch->l_info.size, ch->l_info.width, ch->l_info.ranks,
> + ch->s_info.size, ch->s_info.width, ch->s_info.ranks);
%u instead of %d? Ditto for all debug prints.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1154,7 +1150,7 @@ intel_is_dram_symmetric(u32 val_ch0, u32 val_ch1,
> (ch0->s_info.size == 0 ||
> (ch0->l_info.size == ch0->s_info.size &&
> ch0->l_info.width == ch0->s_info.width &&
> - ch0->l_info.rank == ch0->s_info.rank)));
> + ch0->l_info.ranks == ch0->s_info.ranks)));
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -1185,13 +1181,12 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank
> * memory.
> */
> - if (ch0.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE ||
> - ch1.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> - dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> + if (ch0.ranks == 1 || ch1.ranks == 1)
> + dram_info->ranks = 1;
> else
> - dram_info->rank = max(ch0.rank, ch1.rank);
> + dram_info->ranks = max(ch0.ranks, ch1.ranks);
>
> - if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID) {
> + if (dram_info->ranks == 0) {
> DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1262,8 +1257,7 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * Now read each DUNIT8/9/10/11 to check the rank of each dimms.
> */
> for (i = BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_START; i <= BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_END; i++) {
> - u8 size, width;
> - enum dram_rank rank;
> + u8 size, width, ranks;
> u32 tmp;
>
> val = I915_READ(BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT(i));
> @@ -1274,11 +1268,11 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> tmp = val & BXT_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
>
> if (tmp == BXT_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> - rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> + ranks = 1;
> else if (tmp == BXT_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> - rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> + ranks = 2;
> else
> - rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> + ranks = 0;
>
> tmp = val & BXT_DRAM_SIZE_MASK;
> if (tmp == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_4GB)
> @@ -1296,22 +1290,21 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> tmp = (val & BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
> width = (1 << tmp) * 8;
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dram size:%dGB width:X%d rank:%s\n", size,
> - width, rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE ? "single" :
> - rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL ? "dual" : "unknown");
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dram size:%dGB width:X%d ranks:%d\n",
> + size, width, ranks);
>
> /*
> * If any of the channel is single rank channel,
> * worst case output will be same as if single rank
> * memory, so consider single rank memory.
> */
> - if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID)
> - dram_info->rank = rank;
> - else if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> - dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> + if (dram_info->ranks == 0)
> + dram_info->ranks = ranks;
> + else if (ranks == 1)
> + dram_info->ranks = 1;
> }
>
> - if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID) {
> + if (dram_info->ranks == 0) {
> DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1328,7 +1321,7 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> int ret;
>
> dram_info->valid = false;
> - dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> + dram_info->ranks = 0;
> dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0;
> dram_info->num_channels = 0;
>
> @@ -1358,9 +1351,8 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> sprintf(bandwidth_str, "unknown");
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM bandwidth:%s, total-channels: %u\n",
> bandwidth_str, dram_info->num_channels);
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
> - (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL) ?
> - "dual" : "single", yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM ranks: %d, 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
> + dram_info->ranks, yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index cc09caf3870e..c9cb13a6edaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1833,11 +1833,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> bool valid;
> bool is_16gb_dimm;
> u8 num_channels;
> - enum dram_rank {
> - I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID = 0,
> - I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE,
> - I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL
> - } rank;
> + u8 ranks;
> u32 bandwidth_kbps;
> bool symmetric_memory;
> } dram_info;
> @@ -2071,10 +2067,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>
> struct dram_channel_info {
> struct info {
> - u8 size, width;
> - enum dram_rank rank;
> + u8 size, width, ranks;
> } l_info, s_info;
> - enum dram_rank rank;
> + u8 ranks;
> bool is_16gb_dimm;
> };
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list