[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix placement of ICP_PP_CONTROL

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Mar 4 21:13:12 UTC 2019


On Mon, 04 Mar 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 05:14:05PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> This register was placed in the middle of the PP_STATUS definition. Move
>> it down together with PP_CONTROL and fix the aligment of the bit
>> definition (as per documentation it should be 2 spaces instead of 1).
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index c9b868347481..bbbc0649a180 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -4692,17 +4692,6 @@ enum {
>>  #define _PP_STATUS			0x61200
>>  #define PP_STATUS(pps_idx)		_MMIO_PPS(pps_idx, _PP_STATUS)
>>  #define   PP_ON				(1 << 31)
>> -
>> -#define _PP_CONTROL_1			0xc7204
>> -#define _PP_CONTROL_2			0xc7304
>> -#define ICP_PP_CONTROL(x)		_MMIO(((x) == 1) ? _PP_CONTROL_1 : \
>> -					      _PP_CONTROL_2)
>> -#define  POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK	(0x1f << 4)
>> -#define  POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT	4
>> -#define  VDD_OVERRIDE_FORCE		(1 << 3)
>> -#define  BACKLIGHT_ENABLE		(1 << 2)
>> -#define  PWR_DOWN_ON_RESET		(1 << 1)
>> -#define  PWR_STATE_TARGET		(1 << 0)
>>  /*
>>   * Indicates that all dependencies of the panel are on:
>>   *
>> @@ -4728,6 +4717,17 @@ enum {
>>  #define   PP_SEQUENCE_STATE_ON_S1_3	(0xb << 0)
>>  #define   PP_SEQUENCE_STATE_RESET	(0xf << 0)
>>  
>> +#define _PP_CONTROL_1			0xc7204
>> +#define _PP_CONTROL_2			0xc7304
>> +#define ICP_PP_CONTROL(x)		_MMIO(((x) == 1) ? _PP_CONTROL_1 : \
>> +					      _PP_CONTROL_2)
>> +#define   POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK	(0x1f << 4)
>> +#define   POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT	4
>> +#define   VDD_OVERRIDE_FORCE		(1 << 3)
>> +#define   BACKLIGHT_ENABLE		(1 << 2)
>> +#define   PWR_DOWN_ON_RESET		(1 << 1)
>> +#define   PWR_STATE_TARGET		(1 << 0)
>
> This entire register looks 100% redundant. Just nuke the whole thing?

Needed in the future?

BR,
Jani.

>
>> +
>>  #define _PP_CONTROL			0x61204
>>  #define PP_CONTROL(pps_idx)		_MMIO_PPS(pps_idx, _PP_CONTROL)
>>  #define  PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS		(0xabcd << 16)
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list