[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix placement of ICP_PP_CONTROL
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Mar 4 21:13:12 UTC 2019
On Mon, 04 Mar 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 05:14:05PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> This register was placed in the middle of the PP_STATUS definition. Move
>> it down together with PP_CONTROL and fix the aligment of the bit
>> definition (as per documentation it should be 2 spaces instead of 1).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index c9b868347481..bbbc0649a180 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -4692,17 +4692,6 @@ enum {
>> #define _PP_STATUS 0x61200
>> #define PP_STATUS(pps_idx) _MMIO_PPS(pps_idx, _PP_STATUS)
>> #define PP_ON (1 << 31)
>> -
>> -#define _PP_CONTROL_1 0xc7204
>> -#define _PP_CONTROL_2 0xc7304
>> -#define ICP_PP_CONTROL(x) _MMIO(((x) == 1) ? _PP_CONTROL_1 : \
>> - _PP_CONTROL_2)
>> -#define POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f << 4)
>> -#define POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 4
>> -#define VDD_OVERRIDE_FORCE (1 << 3)
>> -#define BACKLIGHT_ENABLE (1 << 2)
>> -#define PWR_DOWN_ON_RESET (1 << 1)
>> -#define PWR_STATE_TARGET (1 << 0)
>> /*
>> * Indicates that all dependencies of the panel are on:
>> *
>> @@ -4728,6 +4717,17 @@ enum {
>> #define PP_SEQUENCE_STATE_ON_S1_3 (0xb << 0)
>> #define PP_SEQUENCE_STATE_RESET (0xf << 0)
>>
>> +#define _PP_CONTROL_1 0xc7204
>> +#define _PP_CONTROL_2 0xc7304
>> +#define ICP_PP_CONTROL(x) _MMIO(((x) == 1) ? _PP_CONTROL_1 : \
>> + _PP_CONTROL_2)
>> +#define POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f << 4)
>> +#define POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 4
>> +#define VDD_OVERRIDE_FORCE (1 << 3)
>> +#define BACKLIGHT_ENABLE (1 << 2)
>> +#define PWR_DOWN_ON_RESET (1 << 1)
>> +#define PWR_STATE_TARGET (1 << 0)
>
> This entire register looks 100% redundant. Just nuke the whole thing?
Needed in the future?
BR,
Jani.
>
>> +
>> #define _PP_CONTROL 0x61204
>> #define PP_CONTROL(pps_idx) _MMIO_PPS(pps_idx, _PP_CONTROL)
>> #define PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS (0xabcd << 16)
>> --
>> 2.20.1
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list