[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Fixing error code for WOPCM initialization
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Tue Mar 5 22:05:00 UTC 2019
On 3/4/19 4:55 PM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
> Replacing the -E2BIG error code return for WOPCM
> initialization with -ENODEV. This will prevent the pci from
> picking this up as a warning during fault injection testing.
To clarify, we want to silence this:
>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> index f82a415ea2ba..a651557e6e4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
> GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
>
> if (i915_inject_load_failure())
> - return -E2BIG;
> + return -ENODEV;
Would it be better to just change the final return code in
i915_pci_probe() to ENODEV?
i.e.
err = i915_driver_load(pdev, ent);
if (err)
return i915_error_injected() ? -ENODEV : err;
This way we can test that the possible error codes (E2BIG in this case)
don't hit issues in dedicated cases during onion unwinding.
Daniele
>
> if (guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {
> DRM_ERROR("GuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list