[Intel-gfx] [RFC i-g-t] lib/igt_kms: Set capabilities before get resource
Rodrigo Siqueira
rodrigosiqueiramelo at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 22:49:38 UTC 2019
Hi, I was working on adding the writeback support to VKMS; as a result,
I was using the Liviu’s patchset to validate my implementation [1].
However, I consistently failed to pass the requirements in
igt_display_require(); more specifically, I couldn't pass this test:
igt_skip("No KMS driver or no outputs, pipes: %d, outputs: %d\n",
display->n_pipes, display->n_outputs);
Next, I made a simple code that does the following three steps:
1. Open the device
2. Collect the resource information with drmModeGetResources()
3. Set writeback capability via drmSetClientCap()
4. Print the total of connectors
I noticed that I could not get any connector as well; after some time
debugging the issue and thanks to Anholt’s help in the dri-channel I
learned that I had to use drmSetClientCap() before
drmModeGetResources(). After move all drmSetClientCap() above
drmModeGetResources(), my simple coded displayed the connector
information. I did the same thing within igt_display_require(), and this
test started to pass for me (I did it, in the Liviu’s patch).
In this sense, I checked the igt_display_require() code in the master
branch; and again, I noticed that capabilities are set after getting the
resource information. Is that correct? Is it ok to call
drmModeGetResources() before drmSetClientCap() in this case?
P.s.: I sent it as a RFC because I’m not 100% sure about the change and
the impacts on the tests. If it make sense, I can make a real patch.
1. https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39229/
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo at gmail.com>
---
lib/igt_kms.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
index 7ebab4ca..2de9ac41 100644
--- a/lib/igt_kms.c
+++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
@@ -1886,6 +1886,10 @@ void igt_display_require(igt_display_t *display, int drm_fd)
display->drm_fd = drm_fd;
+ drmSetClientCap(drm_fd, DRM_CLIENT_CAP_UNIVERSAL_PLANES, 1);
+ if (drmSetClientCap(drm_fd, DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ATOMIC, 1) == 0)
+ display->is_atomic = 1;
+
resources = drmModeGetResources(display->drm_fd);
if (!resources)
goto out;
@@ -1898,10 +1902,6 @@ void igt_display_require(igt_display_t *display, int drm_fd)
display->pipes = calloc(sizeof(igt_pipe_t), display->n_pipes);
igt_assert_f(display->pipes, "Failed to allocate memory for %d pipes\n", display->n_pipes);
- drmSetClientCap(drm_fd, DRM_CLIENT_CAP_UNIVERSAL_PLANES, 1);
- if (drmSetClientCap(drm_fd, DRM_CLIENT_CAP_ATOMIC, 1) == 0)
- display->is_atomic = 1;
-
plane_resources = drmModeGetPlaneResources(display->drm_fd);
igt_assert(plane_resources);
--
2.21.0
--
Rodrigo Siqueira
https://siqueira.tech
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
University of São Paulo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20190306/a78a6efd/attachment.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list