[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: parse dsi devices in parse_ddi_ports()
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Mar 7 10:18:15 UTC 2019
On Wed, 06 Mar 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:34:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> For the time being this is only for completeness and better debug
>> logging of DSI ports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index eeeb0d9cfdcd..e14563418aad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -951,6 +951,7 @@ struct ddi_vbt_port_info {
>> u8 supports_hdmi:1;
>> u8 supports_dp:1;
>> u8 supports_edp:1;
>> + u8 supports_dsi:1;
>> u8 supports_typec_usb:1;
>> u8 supports_tbt:1;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> index fc27ffe81c14..9beff569b010 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> @@ -1333,9 +1333,9 @@ static enum port dvo_port_to_port(u8 dvo_port)
>> * so look for all the possible values for each port.
>> */
>> static const int dvo_ports[][3] = {
>> - [PORT_A] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIA, DVO_PORT_DPA, -1},
>> - [PORT_B] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIB, DVO_PORT_DPB, -1},
>> - [PORT_C] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIC, DVO_PORT_DPC, -1},
>> + [PORT_A] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIA, DVO_PORT_DPA, DVO_PORT_MIPIA },
>> + [PORT_B] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIB, DVO_PORT_DPB, DVO_PORT_MIPIB },
>> + [PORT_C] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIC, DVO_PORT_DPC, DVO_PORT_MIPIC },
>
> I wonder if this is going to end up badly on CHV...
Yeah. We also have a bunch of these mapping tables, with various
DVO_PORT_* combos. There's a certain appeal to consolidating them.
So I can't but wonder why we have duplicate information with child
device type and child device specific port numbers. Is there a case
where the distinction helps?
BR,
Jani.
>
>> [PORT_D] = { DVO_PORT_HDMID, DVO_PORT_DPD, -1},
>> [PORT_E] = { DVO_PORT_CRT, DVO_PORT_HDMIE, DVO_PORT_DPE},
>> [PORT_F] = { DVO_PORT_HDMIF, DVO_PORT_DPF, -1},
>> @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> u8 bdb_version)
>> {
>> struct ddi_vbt_port_info *info;
>> - bool is_dvi, is_hdmi, is_dp, is_edp, is_crt;
>> + bool is_dvi, is_hdmi, is_dp, is_edp, is_crt, is_dsi;
>> enum port port;
>>
>> port = dvo_port_to_port(child->dvo_port);
>> @@ -1383,6 +1383,7 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> is_crt = child->device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_ANALOG_OUTPUT;
>> is_hdmi = is_dvi && (child->device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_NOT_HDMI_OUTPUT) == 0;
>> is_edp = is_dp && (child->device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_INTERNAL_CONNECTOR);
>> + is_dsi = child->device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_MIPI_OUTPUT;
>>
>> if (port == PORT_A && is_dvi) {
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("VBT claims port A supports DVI%s, ignoring\n",
>> @@ -1395,6 +1396,7 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> info->supports_hdmi = is_hdmi;
>> info->supports_dp = is_dp;
>> info->supports_edp = is_edp;
>> + info->supports_dsi = is_dsi;
>>
>> if (bdb_version >= 195)
>> info->supports_typec_usb = child->dp_usb_type_c;
>> @@ -1402,8 +1404,8 @@ static void parse_ddi_port(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> if (bdb_version >= 209)
>> info->supports_tbt = child->tbt;
>>
>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %c VBT info: DP:%d HDMI:%d DVI:%d EDP:%d CRT:%d TCUSB:%d TBT:%d\n",
>> - port_name(port), is_dp, is_hdmi, is_dvi, is_edp, is_crt,
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %c VBT info: DP:%d HDMI:%d DVI:%d EDP:%d DSI:%d CRT:%d TCUSB:%d TBT:%d\n",
>> + port_name(port), is_dp, is_hdmi, is_dvi, is_edp, is_dsi, is_crt,
>> info->supports_typec_usb, info->supports_tbt);
>>
>> if (is_edp && is_dvi)
>> --
>> 2.20.1
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list