[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Reorder gen3/4 swizzle detection logic
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Mar 18 16:56:28 UTC 2019
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
g33/i964g/g45 are the exceptional cases when it comes to
the swizzle detectiong. Let's reorder the code to handle
them first and let everything else be handled by the
else branch. This allows us to unset .is_mobile for the
desktop PNV variant (which supposedly must follow the
"mobile" path here).
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 65 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
index 65624b8e4d15..9418ad499b7e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
@@ -585,8 +585,38 @@ i915_gem_detect_bit_6_swizzle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
*/
swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE;
swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE;
- } else if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv) ||
- IS_I915G(dev_priv) || IS_I945G(dev_priv)) {
+ } else if (IS_G45(dev_priv) || IS_I965G(dev_priv) || IS_G33(dev_priv)) {
+ /* The 965, G33, and newer, have a very flexible memory
+ * configuration. It will enable dual-channel mode
+ * (interleaving) on as much memory as it can, and the GPU
+ * will additionally sometimes enable different bit 6
+ * swizzling for tiled objects from the CPU.
+ *
+ * Here's what I found on the G965:
+ * slot fill memory size swizzling
+ * 0A 0B 1A 1B 1-ch 2-ch
+ * 512 0 0 0 512 0 O
+ * 512 0 512 0 16 1008 X
+ * 512 0 0 512 16 1008 X
+ * 0 512 0 512 16 1008 X
+ * 1024 1024 1024 0 2048 1024 O
+ *
+ * We could probably detect this based on either the DRB
+ * matching, which was the case for the swizzling required in
+ * the table above, or from the 1-ch value being less than
+ * the minimum size of a rank.
+ *
+ * Reports indicate that the swizzling actually
+ * varies depending upon page placement inside the
+ * channels, i.e. we see swizzled pages where the
+ * banks of memory are paired and unswizzled on the
+ * uneven portion, so leave that as unknown.
+ */
+ if (I915_READ16(C0DRB3) == I915_READ16(C1DRB3)) {
+ swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10;
+ swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9;
+ }
+ } else {
u32 dcc;
/* On 9xx chipsets, channel interleave by the CPU is
@@ -636,37 +666,6 @@ i915_gem_detect_bit_6_swizzle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN;
swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN;
}
- } else {
- /* The 965, G33, and newer, have a very flexible memory
- * configuration. It will enable dual-channel mode
- * (interleaving) on as much memory as it can, and the GPU
- * will additionally sometimes enable different bit 6
- * swizzling for tiled objects from the CPU.
- *
- * Here's what I found on the G965:
- * slot fill memory size swizzling
- * 0A 0B 1A 1B 1-ch 2-ch
- * 512 0 0 0 512 0 O
- * 512 0 512 0 16 1008 X
- * 512 0 0 512 16 1008 X
- * 0 512 0 512 16 1008 X
- * 1024 1024 1024 0 2048 1024 O
- *
- * We could probably detect this based on either the DRB
- * matching, which was the case for the swizzling required in
- * the table above, or from the 1-ch value being less than
- * the minimum size of a rank.
- *
- * Reports indicate that the swizzling actually
- * varies depending upon page placement inside the
- * channels, i.e. we see swizzled pages where the
- * banks of memory are paired and unswizzled on the
- * uneven portion, so leave that as unknown.
- */
- if (I915_READ16(C0DRB3) == I915_READ16(C1DRB3)) {
- swizzle_x = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10;
- swizzle_y = I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9;
- }
}
if (swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_UNKNOWN ||
--
2.19.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list