[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/icl: Set GCP_COLOR_INDICATION only for 10/12 bit deep color (rev8)

Tomi Sarvela tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com
Mon May 6 06:59:43 UTC 2019


On 5/4/19 8:55 AM, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> Hi,
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
>> Aditya Swarup
>> Sent: lauantai 4. toukokuuta 2019 2.04
>> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Peres, Martin <martin.peres at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/icl: Set
>> GCP_COLOR_INDICATION only for 10/12 bit deep color (rev8)
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:46:15PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
>>> == Series Details ==
>>>
>>> Series: drm/i915/icl: Set GCP_COLOR_INDICATION only for 10/12 bit deep color
>> (rev8)
>>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58912/
>>> State : failure
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>>
>>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6012_full -> Patchwork_12900_full
>>> ====================================================
>>>
>>> Summary
>>> -------
>>>
>>>    **FAILURE**
>>>
>>>    Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_12900_full absolutely need to
>> be
>>>    verified manually.
>>>
>>>    If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>>>    introduced in Patchwork_12900_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
>>>    to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Possible new issues
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>>    Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
>> Patchwork_12900_full:
>>>
>>> ### IGT changes ###
>>>
>>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>>
>>>    * igt at gem_caching@read-writes:
>>>      - shard-skl:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +6 similar issues
>>>     [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6012/shard-
>> skl9/igt at gem_caching@read-writes.html
>>>     [2]:
>>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12900/shard-skl9/ig
>>> t at gem_caching@read-writes.html
>>>
>>>    * igt at gem_mmap_gtt@forked-big-copy-odd:
>>>      - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] +1 similar issue
>>>     [3]:
>>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12900/shard-skl2/ig
>>> t at gem_mmap_gtt@forked-big-copy-odd.html
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> These failures shouldn't be due to my patch. Is there a separate bug filed for
>> gem_caching and gem_mmap_gtt failures?
> Yes, this still I guess due to : https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12900/shard-skl2/run25.log
> => Tomi, still happening: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110581
> 
> Br,
> Jani

This was fixed around IGT_4972 / CI_DRM_6026. We're looking at results 
from around CI_DRM_6012, so yes, 10min timeouts were still happening.

Tomi


>>> Build changes
>>> -------------
>>>
>>>    * Linux: CI_DRM_6012 -> Patchwork_12900


Tomi
-- 
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list