[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] benchmarks/gem_wsim: Perturb static_vcs selection across clients

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue May 14 11:35:06 UTC 2019


Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-14 12:30:10)
> 
> On 14/05/2019 12:04, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Use the client id to alternate the static_vcs balancer (-b context)
> > across clients with the round robin flag (-R) - otherwise all clients
> > end up on vcs0 and do not match the context balancing employed by
> > media-driver.
> > 
> > v2: Put it behind the -R flag.
> > v3: Don't skip -R flag for -b context in scripts/media-bench.pl
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   benchmarks/gem_wsim.c  | 6 ++++--
> >   scripts/media-bench.pl | 2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> > index afb9644dd..48568ce40 100644
> > --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> > +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> > @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ alloc_step_batch(struct workload *wrk, struct w_step *w, unsigned int flags)
> >   static void
> >   prepare_workload(unsigned int id, struct workload *wrk, unsigned int flags)
> >   {
> > -     unsigned int ctx_vcs = 0;
> > +     unsigned int ctx_vcs;
> >       int max_ctx = -1;
> >       struct w_step *w;
> >       int i;
> > @@ -948,8 +948,10 @@ prepare_workload(unsigned int id, struct workload *wrk, unsigned int flags)
> >       wrk->prng = rand();
> >       wrk->run = true;
> >   
> > +     ctx_vcs =  0;
> >       if (flags & INITVCSRR)
> > -             wrk->vcs_rr = id & 1;
> > +             ctx_vcs = id & 1;
> > +     wrk->vcs_rr = ctx_vcs;
> >   
> >       if (flags & GLOBAL_BALANCE) {
> >               int ret = pthread_mutex_init(&wrk->mutex, NULL);
> > diff --git a/scripts/media-bench.pl b/scripts/media-bench.pl
> > index 066b542f9..f1cd59a25 100755
> > --- a/scripts/media-bench.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/media-bench.pl
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ my @balancers = ( 'rr', 'rand', 'qd', 'qdr', 'qdavg', 'rt', 'rtr', 'rtavg',
> >                 'context', 'busy', 'busy-avg' );
> >   my %bal_skip_H = ( 'rr' => 1, 'rand' => 1, 'context' => 1, , 'busy' => 1,
> >                  'busy-avg' => 1 );
> > -my %bal_skip_R = ( 'context' => 1 );
> > +my %bal_skip_R = ();
> >   
> >   my @workloads = (
> >       'media_load_balance_17i7.wsim',
> > 
> 
> This probably means I was thinking -G covers this for -b context, which 
> it does. Difference between -R and -G there seems purely in wording 
> since clients are initialized sequentially and in deterministic order. 
> Hm I guess for heterogeneous clients they would be different. Okay, 
> makes sense then.

Hmm, right there is a subtle difference between context_vcs_rr and
ctx_vcs here. If a client creates an odd number of contexts, but doesn't
use all the VCS engines, it is still possible for -G to end up with all
active workloads on VCS0 and -R avoids that.
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list