[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: skip the second CRC even for GEN 7 GPUs
Harish Chegondi
harish.chegondi at intel.com
Thu May 16 05:58:06 UTC 2019
display_pipe_crc_irq_handler() skips the first CRC for all GPUs and the
second CRC for GEN8+ GPUs. The second CRC is invalid even for BYT which
is a GEN7 GPU. So, skip the second CRC even for GEN7 GPUs.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi at intel.com>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 233211fde0ea..3809e9f7fae2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1775,11 +1775,11 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
* bonkers. So let's just wait for the next vblank and read
* out the buggy result.
*
- * On GEN8+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
+ * On GEN7+ sometimes the second CRC is bonkers as well, so
* don't trust that one either.
*/
if (pipe_crc->skipped <= 0 ||
- (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
+ (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7 && pipe_crc->skipped == 1)) {
pipe_crc->skipped++;
spin_unlock(&pipe_crc->lock);
return;
--
2.21.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list