[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 13/16] i915: Add gem_exec_balancer
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu May 16 09:20:20 UTC 2019
On 15/05/2019 20:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-15 11:49:45)
>>
>> On 08/05/2019 11:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Exercise the in-kernel load balancer checking that we can distribute
>>> batches across the set of ctx->engines to avoid load.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> tests/Makefile.am | 1 +
>>> tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +
>>> tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c | 1050 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> tests/meson.build | 7 +
>>> 4 files changed, 1059 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
>>> index 5097debf6..c6af0aeaf 100644
>>> --- a/tests/Makefile.am
>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.am
>>> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ gem_close_race_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lpthread
>>> gem_ctx_thrash_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) $(THREAD_CFLAGS)
>>> gem_ctx_thrash_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lpthread
>>> gem_ctx_sseu_LDADD = $(LDADD) $(top_builddir)/lib/libigt_perf.la
>>> +i915_gem_exec_balancer_LDADD = $(LDADD) $(top_builddir)/lib/libigt_perf.la
>>> gem_exec_capture_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lz
>>> gem_exec_parallel_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) $(THREAD_CFLAGS)
>>> gem_exec_parallel_LDADD = $(LDADD) -lpthread
>>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
>>> index e7ee27e81..323b625aa 100644
>>> --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ TESTS_progs = \
>>> i915/gem_ctx_clone \
>>> i915/gem_ctx_engines \
>>> i915/gem_ctx_shared \
>>> + i915/gem_exec_balancer \
>>> i915/gem_vm_create \
>>> kms_3d \
>>> kms_addfb_basic \
>>> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000..25195d478
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1050 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright © 2018 Intel Corporation
>>
>> 2019 I guess, even though work was started in 2018?
>>
>>> + *
>>> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
>>> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
>>> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
>>> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
>>> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
>>> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
>>> + *
>>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
>>> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
>>> + * Software.
>>> + *
>>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
>>> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
>>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
>>> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
>>> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
>>> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
>>> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <sched.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "igt.h"
>>> +#include "igt_perf.h"
>>> +#include "i915/gem_ring.h"
>>> +#include "sw_sync.h"
>>> +
>>> +IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Exercise in-kernel load-balancing");
>>> +
>>> +#define INSTANCE_COUNT (1 << I915_PMU_SAMPLE_INSTANCE_BITS)
>>
>> Hmm.. this is a strange surrogate but I guess it works.
>>
>>> +
>>> +static bool has_class_instance(int i915, uint16_t class, uint16_t instance)
>>> +{
>>> + int fd;
>>> +
>>> + fd = perf_i915_open(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(class, instance));
>>
>> More work for Andi to replace with real engine discovery. :)
>>
>>> + if (fd != -1) {
>>> + close(fd);
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct i915_engine_class_instance *
>>> +list_engines(int i915, uint32_t class_mask, unsigned int *out)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int count = 0, size = 64;
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *engines;
>>> +
>>> + engines = malloc(size * sizeof(*engines));
>>> + if (!engines) {
>>> + *out = 0;
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + for (enum drm_i915_gem_engine_class class = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER;
>>> + class_mask;
>>> + class++, class_mask >>= 1) {
>>> + if (!(class_mask & 1))
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + for (unsigned int instance = 0;
>>> + instance < INSTANCE_COUNT;
>>> + instance++) {
>>> + if (!has_class_instance(i915, class, instance))
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + if (count == size) {
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *e;
>>> +
>>> + size *= 2;
>>> + e = realloc(engines, size*sizeof(*engines));
>>> + if (!e) {
>>
>> I'd just assert. On malloc as well.
>>
>>> + *out = count;
>>> + return engines;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + engines = e;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + engines[count++] = (struct i915_engine_class_instance){
>>> + .engine_class = class,
>>> + .engine_instance = instance,
>>> + };
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!count) {
>>> + free(engines);
>>> + engines = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + *out = count;
>>> + return engines;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __set_load_balancer(int i915, uint32_t ctx,
>>> + const struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci,
>>> + unsigned int count)
>>> +{
>>> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_ENGINES_LOAD_BALANCE(balancer, count);
>>> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES(engines, 1 + count);
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param p = {
>>> + .ctx_id = ctx,
>>> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
>>> + .size = sizeof(engines),
>>> + .value = to_user_pointer(&engines)
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + memset(&balancer, 0, sizeof(balancer));
>>> + balancer.base.name = I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_LOAD_BALANCE;
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert(count);
>>> + balancer.num_siblings = count;
>>> + memcpy(balancer.engines, ci, count * sizeof(*ci));
>>> +
>>> + memset(&engines, 0, sizeof(engines));
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(&balancer);
>>> + engines.engines[0].engine_class =
>>> + I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID;
>>> + engines.engines[0].engine_instance =
>>> + I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE;
>>> + memcpy(engines.engines + 1, ci, count * sizeof(*ci));
>>> +
>>> + return __gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void set_load_balancer(int i915, uint32_t ctx,
>>> + const struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci,
>>> + unsigned int count)
>>> +{
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__set_load_balancer(i915, ctx, ci, count), 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static uint32_t load_balancer_create(int i915,
>>> + const struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci,
>>> + unsigned int count)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>> +
>>> + ctx = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> + set_load_balancer(i915, ctx, ci, count);
>>> +
>>> + return ctx;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static uint32_t __batch_create(int i915, uint32_t offset)
>>> +{
>>> + const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
>>> + uint32_t handle;
>>> +
>>> + handle = gem_create(i915, ALIGN(offset + 4, 4096));
>>> + gem_write(i915, handle, offset, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
>>> +
>>> + return handle;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static uint32_t batch_create(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + return __batch_create(i915, 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void invalid_balancer(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_ENGINES_LOAD_BALANCE(balancer, 64);
>>> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES(engines, 64);
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param p = {
>>> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
>>> + .value = to_user_pointer(&engines)
>>> + };
>>> + uint32_t handle;
>>> + void *ptr;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Assume that I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINE validates the array
>>> + * of engines[], our job is to determine if the load_balancer
>>> + * extension explodes.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + for (int class = 0; class < 32; class++) {
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1 << class, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines\n", count);
>>> + igt_assert_lte(count, 64);
>>
>> Hey.. you always say trust the kernel! ;)
>
> This code was placeholder that you said you would replace by a proper
> query api...
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + p.ctx_id = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> + p.size = (sizeof(struct i915_context_param_engines) +
>>> + (count + 1) * sizeof(*engines.engines));
>>
>> Alignment looks off.
>>
>>> +
>>> + memset(&engines, 0, sizeof(engines));
>>> + engines.engines[0].engine_class = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID;
>>> + engines.engines[0].engine_instance = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE;
>>> + memcpy(engines.engines + 1, ci, count * sizeof(*ci));
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + engines.extensions = -1ull;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> +
>>> + engines.extensions = 1ull;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> +
>>> + memset(&balancer, 0, sizeof(balancer));
>>> + balancer.base.name = I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_LOAD_BALANCE;
>>> + balancer.num_siblings = count;
>>> + memcpy(balancer.engines, ci, count * sizeof(*ci));
>>> +
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(&balancer);
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.engine_index = 1;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EEXIST);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.engine_index = count;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EEXIST);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.engine_index = count + 1;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EINVAL);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.engine_index = 0;
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.base.next_extension = to_user_pointer(&balancer);
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EEXIST);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.base.next_extension = -1ull;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> +
>>> + handle = gem_create(i915, 4096 * 3);
>>> + ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(i915, handle, 4096 * 3, PROT_WRITE);
>>> + gem_close(i915, handle);
>>> +
>>> + memset(&engines, 0, sizeof(engines));
>>> + engines.engines[0].engine_class = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID;
>>> + engines.engines[0].engine_instance = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE;
>>> + engines.engines[1].engine_class = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID;
>>> + engines.engines[1].engine_instance = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE;
>>> + memcpy(engines.engines + 2, ci, count * sizeof(ci));
>>> + p.size = (sizeof(struct i915_context_param_engines) +
>>> + (count + 2) * sizeof(*engines.engines));
>>
>> Alignment again.
>>
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.base.next_extension = 0;
>>> + balancer.engine_index = 1;
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(&balancer);
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + memcpy(ptr + 4096 - 8, &balancer, sizeof(balancer));
>>> + memcpy(ptr + 8192 - 8, &balancer, sizeof(balancer));
>>> + balancer.engine_index = 0;
>>> +
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(ptr) + 4096 - 8;
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.base.next_extension = engines.extensions;
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(&balancer);
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>
>> mmap_gtt and unmapped area testing in one?
>
> Neighbouring.
>
>>> + munmap(ptr, 4096); >+ igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(ptr) + 4096 - 8;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> +
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(ptr) + 8192 - 8;
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + balancer.base.next_extension = engines.extensions;
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(&balancer);
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + munmap(ptr + 8192, 4096);
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(ptr) + 8192 - 8;
>>> + igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &p), -EFAULT);
>>> +
>>> + munmap(ptr + 4096, 4096);
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, p.ctx_id);
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void kick_kthreads(int period_us)
>>> +{
>>> + sched_yield();
>>> + usleep(period_us);
>>
>> yield and sleep hm.. calling with zero period_us? Doesn't seem like it.
>> So what's it about?
>
> Historically yield may have been a no-op, but sleep(0) actually yielded.
>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static double measure_load(int pmu, int period_us)
>>> +{
>>> + uint64_t data[2];
>>> + uint64_t d_t, d_v;
>>> +
>>> + kick_kthreads(period_us);
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert_eq(read(pmu, data, sizeof(data)), sizeof(data));
>>> + d_v = -data[0];
>>> + d_t = -data[1];
>>> +
>>> + usleep(period_us);
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert_eq(read(pmu, data, sizeof(data)), sizeof(data));
>>> + d_v += data[0];
>>> + d_t += data[1];
>>
>> This -val + val trick with uint64_t works?
>
> Yes, unsigned overflow is defined.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + return d_v / (double)d_t;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static double measure_min_load(int pmu, unsigned int num, int period_us)
>>> +{
>>> + uint64_t data[2 + num];
>>> + uint64_t d_t, d_v[num];
>>> + uint64_t min = -1, max = 0;
>>> +
>>> + kick_kthreads(period_us);
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert_eq(read(pmu, data, sizeof(data)), sizeof(data));
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < num; n++)
>>> + d_v[n] = -data[2 + n];
>>> + d_t = -data[1];
>>> +
>>> + usleep(period_us);
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert_eq(read(pmu, data, sizeof(data)), sizeof(data));
>>> +
>>> + d_t += data[1];
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < num; n++) {
>>> + d_v[n] += data[2 + n];
>>> + igt_debug("engine[%d]: %.1f%%\n",
>>> + n, d_v[n] / (double)d_t * 100);
>>> + if (d_v[n] < min)
>>> + min = d_v[n];
>>> + if (d_v[n] > max)
>>> + max = d_v[n];
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("elapsed: %"PRIu64"ns, load [%.1f, %.1f]%%\n",
>>> + d_t, min / (double)d_t * 100, max / (double)d_t * 100);
>>> +
>>> + return min / (double)d_t;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void check_individual_engine(int i915,
>>> + uint32_t ctx,
>>> + const struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci,
>>> + int idx)
>>> +{
>>> + igt_spin_t *spin;
>>> + double load;
>>> + int pmu;
>>> +
>>> + pmu = perf_i915_open(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(ci[idx].engine_class,
>>> + ci[idx].engine_instance));
>>> +
>>> + spin = igt_spin_new(i915, .ctx = ctx, .engine = idx + 1);
>>> + load = measure_load(pmu, 10000);
>>
>> Hm usleep before start of measuring and between two samples is the same.
>> The one before should be fixed I think, no?
>
> Could be, that would require thought as to what the appropriate period
> for kicking should be. Yay for ksoftirqd.
>
>>> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin);
>>> +
>>> + close(pmu);
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert_f(load > 0.90,
>>> + "engine %d (class:instance %d:%d) was found to be only %.1f%% busy\n",
>>> + idx, ci[idx].engine_class, ci[idx].engine_instance, load*100);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void individual(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINE allows us to index into the user
>>> + * supplied array from gem_execbuf(). Our check is to build the
>>> + * ctx->engine[] with various different engine classes, feed in
>>> + * a spinner and then ask pmu to confirm it the expected engine
>>> + * was busy.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + ctx = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> +
>>> + for (int mask = 0; mask < 32; mask++) {
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << mask, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines of class %d\n", count, mask);
>>> +
>>> + for (int pass = 0; pass < count; pass++) { /* approx. count! */
>>> + igt_permute_array(ci, count, igt_exchange_int64);
>>
>> struct i915_engine_class_instance is four bytes long, so swap func looks
>> wrong. Unless for some reason you want to swap in blocks of two. Don't
>> know. Last index would grab into random memory though. I must be missing
>> something or it wouldn't have worked..
>
> Once upon a time class_instance was 2xu32.
>
>>
>>> + set_load_balancer(i915, ctx, ci, count);
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < count; n++)
>>> + check_individual_engine(i915, ctx, ci, n);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void indicies(int i915)
>>
>> indices?
>>
>>> +{
>>> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES(engines, I915_EXEC_RING_MASK + 1);
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param p = {
>>> + .ctx_id = gem_context_create(i915),
>>> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
>>> + .value = to_user_pointer(&engines)
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 batch = {
>>> + .handle = batch_create(i915),
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + unsigned int nengines = 0;
>>> + void *balancers = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * We can populate our engine map with multiple virtual engines.
>>> + * Do so.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + for (int class = 0; class < 32; class++) {
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << class, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines of class %d\n", count, class);
>>
>> Maybe this debug message should go into list_engines, since it seems
>> repeated a few times already.
>
> Or remove the debug, I hear you.
>
>>> +
>>> + for (int n = 0; n < count; n++) {
>>> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_ENGINES_LOAD_BALANCE(*balancer,
>>> + count);
>>> +
>>> + engines.engines[nengines].engine_class =
>>> + I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID;
>>> + engines.engines[nengines].engine_instance =
>>> + I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE;
>>> +
>>> + balancer = calloc(sizeof(*balancer), 1);
>>> + igt_assert(balancer);
>>> +
>>> + balancer->base.name =
>>> + I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_LOAD_BALANCE;
>>> + balancer->base.next_extension =
>>> + to_user_pointer(balancers);
>>> + balancers = balancer;
>>> +
>>> + balancer->engine_index = nengines++;
>>> + balancer->num_siblings = count;
>>> +
>>> + memcpy(balancer->engines,
>>> + ci, count * sizeof(*ci));
>>> + }
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_require(balancers);
>>> + engines.extensions = to_user_pointer(balancers);
>>> + p.size = (sizeof(struct i915_engine_class_instance) * nengines +
>>> + sizeof(struct i915_context_param_engines));
>>> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &p);
>>> +
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < nengines; n++) {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&batch),
>>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>>> + .flags = n,
>>> + .rsvd1 = p.ctx_id,
>>> + };
>>> + igt_debug("Executing on index=%d\n", n);
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
>>> + }
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, p.ctx_id);
>>> +
>>> + gem_sync(i915, batch.handle);
>>> + gem_close(i915, batch.handle);
>>> +
>>> + while (balancers) {
>>> + struct i915_context_engines_load_balance *b, *n;
>>> +
>>> + b = balancers;
>>> + n = from_user_pointer(b->base.next_extension);
>>> + free(b);
>>> +
>>> + balancers = n;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void busy(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t scratch = gem_create(i915, 4096);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Check that virtual engines are reported via GEM_BUSY.
>>> + *
>>> + * When running, the batch will be on the real engine and report
>>> + * the actual class.
>>> + *
>>> + * Prior to running, if the load-balancer is across multiple
>>> + * classes we don't know which engine the batch will
>>> + * execute on, so we report them all!
>>> + *
>>> + * However, as we only support (and test) creating a load-balancer
>>> + * from engines of only one class, that can be propagated accurately
>>> + * through to GEM_BUSY.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + for (int class = 0; class < 16; class++) {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_busy busy;
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> + igt_spin_t *spin[2];
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << class, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines of class %d\n", count, class);
>>> + ctx = load_balancer_create(i915, ci, count);
>>> + free(ci);
>>> +
>>> + spin[0] = __igt_spin_new(i915,
>>> + .ctx = ctx,
>>> + .flags = IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN);
>>> + spin[1] = __igt_spin_new(i915,
>>> + .ctx = ctx,
>>> + .dependency = scratch);
>>> +
>>> + igt_spin_busywait_until_started(spin[0]);
>>> +
>>> + /* Running: actual class */
>>> + busy.handle = spin[0]->handle;
>>> + do_ioctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_BUSY, &busy);
>>> + igt_assert_eq_u32(busy.busy, 1u << (class + 16));
>>> +
>>> + /* Queued(read): expected class */
>>> + busy.handle = spin[1]->handle;
>>> + do_ioctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_BUSY, &busy);
>>> + igt_assert_eq_u32(busy.busy, 1u << (class + 16));
>>> +
>>> + /* Queued(write): expected class */
>>> + busy.handle = scratch;
>>> + do_ioctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_BUSY, &busy);
>>> + igt_assert_eq_u32(busy.busy,
>>> + (1u << (class + 16)) | (class + 1));
>>> +
>>> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin[1]);
>>> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin[0]);
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gem_close(i915, scratch);
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int add_pmu(int pmu, const struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci)
>>> +{
>>> + return perf_i915_open_group(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(ci->engine_class,
>>> + ci->engine_instance),
>>> + pmu);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void full(int i915, unsigned int flags)
>>> +#define PULSE 0x1
>>> +#define LATE 0x2
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 batch = {
>>> + .handle = batch_create(i915),
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + if (flags & LATE)
>>> + igt_require_sw_sync();
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINE changes the meaning of I915_EXEC_DEFAULT
>>> + * to provide an automatic selection from the ctx->engine[]. It
>>> + * employs load-balancing to evenly distribute the workload the
>>
>> The leading section needs rewritting for truth. It is the load balance
>> extensions which _can_ redefine the meanign of I915_EXEC_DEFAULT etc..
>> I'm sure I didn't need to explain, but have just to make it clear which
>> part I am complaining about. :)
>
> Hey, remember this is 2018!
You give me too much credit, I just go and mindlessly review. :)
>
>>> + * array. If we submit N spinners, we expect them to be simultaneously
>>> + * running across N engines and use PMU to confirm that the entire
>>> + * set of engines are busy.
>>
>> Clarify it is only if using N contexts.
>>
>>> + *
>>> + * We complicate matters by interpersing shortlived tasks to challenge
>>> + * the kernel to search for space in which to insert new batches.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + for (int mask = 0; mask < 32; mask++) {
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + igt_spin_t *spin = NULL;
>>> + IGT_CORK_FENCE(cork);
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> + double load;
>>> + int fence = -1;
>>> + int *pmu;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << mask, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines of class %d\n", count, mask);
>>> +
>>> + pmu = malloc(sizeof(*pmu) * count);
>>> + igt_assert(pmu);
>>> +
>>> + if (flags & LATE)
>>> + fence = igt_cork_plug(&cork, i915);
>>> +
>>> + pmu[0] = -1;
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < count; n++) {
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>> +
>>> + pmu[n] = add_pmu(pmu[0], &ci[n]);
>>> +
>>> + if (flags & PULSE) {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&batch),
>>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>>> + .rsvd2 = fence,
>>> + .flags = flags & LATE ? I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN : 0,
>>> + };
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Each spinner needs to be one a new timeline,
>>> + * otherwise they will just sit in the single queue
>>> + * and not run concurrently.
>>> + */
>>> + ctx = load_balancer_create(i915, ci, count);
>>> +
>>> + if (spin == NULL) {
>>> + spin = __igt_spin_new(i915, .ctx = ctx);
>>> + } else {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = spin->execbuf.buffers_ptr,
>>> + .buffer_count = spin->execbuf.buffer_count,
>>> + .rsvd1 = ctx,
>>> + .rsvd2 = fence,
>>> + .flags = flags & LATE ? I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN : 0,
>>> + };
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (flags & LATE) {
>>> + igt_cork_unplug(&cork);
>>> + close(fence);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + load = measure_min_load(pmu[0], count, 10000);
>>> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin);
>>> +
>>> + close(pmu[0]);
>>> + free(pmu);
>>> +
>>> + free(ci);
>>> +
>>> + igt_assert_f(load > 0.90,
>>> + "minimum load for %d x class:%d was found to be only %.1f%% busy\n",
>>> + count, mask, load*100);
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gem_close(i915, batch.handle);
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void nop(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 batch = {
>>> + .handle = batch_create(i915),
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + for (int mask = 0; mask < 32; mask++) {
>>
>> s/mask/class/
>>
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << mask, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + if (count < 2) {
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + continue;
>>
>> Benchamrk only subtest for real veng?
>
> Sure, that's a bit of internal knowledge leaking.
>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines of class %d\n", count, mask);
>>> + ctx = load_balancer_create(i915, ci, count);
>>> +
>>> + for (int n = 0; n < count; n++) {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&batch),
>>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>>> + .flags = n + 1,
>>> + .rsvd1 = ctx,
>>> + };
>>> + struct timespec tv = {};
>>> + unsigned long nops;
>>> + double t;
>>> +
>>> + igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv);
>>> + nops = 0;
>>> + do {
>>> + for (int r = 0; r < 1024; r++)
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf);
>>> + nops += 1024;
>>> + } while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv) < 2);
>>> + gem_sync(i915, batch.handle);
>>> +
>>> + t = igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv) * 1e-3 / nops;
>>> + igt_info("%x:%d %.3fus\n", mask, n, t);
>>
>> Class in decimal is better I think.
>
> But it's mask :-p
>
> It's treated as just a number and not as a class identifier.
1 << mask is a mask, while mask is a class. :)
>
>> And some descriptive labels to info messages would be good. Like
>> "individual engines", "virtual engine" etc.
>
> It does describe the individual engines and their composites. The output
> looks clear and concise. You may want mask translated to a string... but
> this code is oblivious as to what mask actually is.
>
> The way it is used definitely looks more like mask than class.
My eyeballing the igt_info lines made me think it will be a series of
lines with numbers so not very readable what's what. A word or two on
each line to say what scenario do the numbers relate to shouldn't be
such a chore, no? :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&batch),
>>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>>> + .rsvd1 = ctx,
>>> + };
>>> + struct timespec tv = {};
>>> + unsigned long nops;
>>> + double t;
>>> +
>>> + igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv);
>>> + nops = 0;
>>> + do {
>>> + for (int r = 0; r < 1024; r++)
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf);
>>> + nops += 1024;
>>> + } while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv) < 2);
>>> + gem_sync(i915, batch.handle);
>>> +
>>> + t = igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv) * 1e-3 / nops;
>>> + igt_info("%x:* %.3fus\n", mask, t);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + igt_fork(child, count) {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&batch),
>>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>>> + .flags = child + 1,
>>> + .rsvd1 = gem_context_clone(i915, ctx,
>>> + I915_CONTEXT_CLONE_ENGINES, 0),
>>> + };
>>> + struct timespec tv = {};
>>> + unsigned long nops;
>>> + double t;
>>> +
>>> + igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv);
>>> + nops = 0;
>>> + do {
>>> + for (int r = 0; r < 1024; r++)
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf);
>>> + nops += 1024;
>>> + } while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv) < 2);
>>> + gem_sync(i915, batch.handle);
>>> +
>>> + t = igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv) * 1e-3 / nops;
>>> + igt_info("[%d] %x:%d %.3fus\n", child, mask, child, t);
>>> +
>>> + memset(&tv, 0, sizeof(tv));
>>> + execbuf.flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> + igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv);
>>> + nops = 0;
>>> + do {
>>> + for (int r = 0; r < 1024; r++)
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf);
>>> + nops += 1024;
>>> + } while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv) < 2);
>>> + gem_sync(i915, batch.handle);
>>> +
>>> + t = igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv) * 1e-3 / nops;
>>> + igt_info("[%d] %x:* %.3fus\n", child, mask, t);
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, execbuf.rsvd1);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_waitchildren();
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gem_close(i915, batch.handle);
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void ping(int i915, uint32_t ctx, unsigned int engine)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
>>> + .handle = batch_create(i915),
>>> + };
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
>>> + .buffer_count = 1,
>>> + .flags = engine,
>>> + .rsvd1 = ctx,
>>> + };
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf);
>>> + gem_sync(i915, obj.handle);
>>> + gem_close(i915, obj.handle);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void semaphore(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t block[2], scratch;
>>> + igt_spin_t *spin[3];
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If we are using HW semaphores to launch serialised requests
>>> + * on different engine concurrently, we want to verify that real
>>> + * work is unimpeded.
>>> + */
>>> + igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_preemption(i915));
>>> +
>>> + block[0] = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> + block[1] = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> +
>>> + scratch = gem_create(i915, 4096);
>>> + spin[2] = igt_spin_new(i915, .dependency = scratch);
>>> + for (int mask = 1; mask < 32; mask++) {
>>
>> s/mask/class/ throughout.
>>
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count;
>>> + uint32_t vip;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << mask, &count);
>>> + if (!ci)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + if (count < ARRAY_SIZE(block))
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + /* Ensure that we completely occupy all engines in this group */
>>> + count = ARRAY_SIZE(block);
>>> +
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>> + set_load_balancer(i915, block[i], ci, count);
>>> + spin[i] = __igt_spin_new(i915,
>>> + .ctx = block[i],
>>> + .dependency = scratch);
>>
>> Alignment.
>>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Either we haven't blocked both engines with semaphores,
>>> + * or we let the vip through. If not, we hang.
>>> + */
>>> + vip = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> + set_load_balancer(i915, vip, ci, count);
>>> + ping(i915, vip, 0);
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, vip);
>>> +
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
>>> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin[i]);
>>> +
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + }
>>> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin[2]);
>>> + gem_close(i915, scratch);
>>> +
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, block[1]);
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, block[0]);
>>> +
>>> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void smoketest(int i915, int timeout)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 batch[2] = {
>>> + { .handle = __batch_create(i915, 16380) }
>>> + };
>>> + unsigned int ncontext = 0;
>>> + uint32_t *contexts = NULL;
>>> + uint32_t *handles = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + igt_require_sw_sync();
>>> +
>>> + for (int mask = 0; mask < 32; mask++) {
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance *ci;
>>> + unsigned int count = 0;
>>> +
>>> + ci = list_engines(i915, 1u << mask, &count);
>>> + if (!ci || count < 2) {
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + continue;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_debug("Found %d engines of class %d\n", count, mask);
>>> +
>>> + ncontext += 128;
>>> + contexts = realloc(contexts, sizeof(*contexts) * ncontext);
>>> + igt_assert(contexts);
>>> +
>>> + for (unsigned int n = ncontext - 128; n < ncontext; n++) {
>>> + contexts[n] = load_balancer_create(i915, ci, count);
>>> + igt_assert(contexts[n]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + free(ci);
>>> + }
>>> + igt_debug("Created %d virtual engines (one per context)\n", ncontext);
>>> + igt_require(ncontext);
>>> +
>>> + contexts = realloc(contexts, sizeof(*contexts) * ncontext * 4);
>>> + igt_assert(contexts);
>>> + memcpy(contexts + ncontext, contexts, ncontext * sizeof(*contexts));
>>> + ncontext *= 2;
>>> + memcpy(contexts + ncontext, contexts, ncontext * sizeof(*contexts));
>>> + ncontext *= 2;
>>> +
>>> + handles = malloc(sizeof(*handles) * ncontext);
>>> + igt_assert(handles);
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < ncontext; n++)
>>> + handles[n] = gem_create(i915, 4096);
>>> +
>>> + igt_until_timeout(timeout) {
>>> + unsigned int count = 1 + (rand() % (ncontext - 1));
>>> + IGT_CORK_FENCE(cork);
>>> + int fence = igt_cork_plug(&cork, i915);
>>> +
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < count; n++) {
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
>>> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(batch),
>>> + .buffer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(batch),
>>> + .rsvd1 = contexts[n],
>>> + .rsvd2 = fence,
>>> + .flags = I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST | I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN,
>>> + };
>>> + batch[1].handle = handles[n];
>>> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
>>> + }
>>> + igt_permute_array(handles, count, igt_exchange_int);
>>> +
>>> + igt_cork_unplug(&cork);
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < count; n++)
>>> + gem_sync(i915, handles[n]);
>>> +
>>> + close(fence);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + for (unsigned int n = 0; n < ncontext; n++) {
>>> + gem_close(i915, handles[n]);
>>> + __gem_context_destroy(i915, contexts[n]);
>>> + }
>>> + free(handles);
>>> + free(contexts);
>>> + gem_close(i915, batch[0].handle);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static bool has_context_engines(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param p = {
>>> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + return __gem_context_set_param(i915, &p) == 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static bool has_load_balancer(int i915)
>>> +{
>>> + struct i915_engine_class_instance ci = {};
>>> + uint32_t ctx;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + ctx = gem_context_create(i915);
>>> + err = __set_load_balancer(i915, ctx, &ci, 1);
>>> + gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>> +
>>> + return err == 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +igt_main
>>> +{
>>> + int i915 = -1;
>>> +
>>> + igt_skip_on_simulation();
>>> +
>>> + igt_fixture {
>>> + i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>>> + igt_require_gem(i915);
>>> +
>>> + gem_require_contexts(i915);
>>> + igt_require(has_context_engines(i915));
>>> + igt_require(has_load_balancer(i915));
>>> +
>>> + igt_fork_hang_detector(i915);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("invalid-balancer")
>>> + invalid_balancer(i915);
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("individual")
>>> + individual(i915);
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("indicies")
>>> + indicies(i915);
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("busy")
>>> + busy(i915);
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest_group {
>>> + static const struct {
>>> + const char *name;
>>> + unsigned int flags;
>>> + } phases[] = {
>>> + { "", 0 },
>>> + { "-pulse", PULSE },
>>> + { "-late", LATE },
>>> + { "-late-pulse", PULSE | LATE },
>>> + { }
>>> + };
>>> + for (typeof(*phases) *p = phases; p->name; p++)
>>> + igt_subtest_f("full%s", p->name)
>>> + full(i915, p->flags);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("nop")
>>> + nop(i915);
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("semaphore")
>>> + semaphore(i915);
>>> +
>>> + igt_subtest("smoke")
>>> + smoketest(i915, 20);
>>> +
>>> + igt_fixture {
>>> + igt_stop_hang_detector();
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
>>> index 7e0089e74..eeea3611d 100644
>>> --- a/tests/meson.build
>>> +++ b/tests/meson.build
>>> @@ -288,6 +288,13 @@ test_executables += executable('gem_eio',
>>> install : true)
>>> test_list += 'gem_eio'
>>>
>>> +test_executables += executable('gem_exec_balancer', 'i915/gem_exec_balancer.c',
>>> + dependencies : test_deps + [ lib_igt_perf ],
>>> + install_dir : libexecdir,
>>> + install_rpath : libexecdir_rpathdir,
>>> + install : true)
>>> +test_progs += 'gem_exec_balancer'
>>> +
>>> test_executables += executable('gem_mocs_settings',
>>> join_paths('i915', 'gem_mocs_settings.c'),
>>> dependencies : test_deps + [ lib_igt_perf ],
>>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list