[Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/7] drm/i915: move and rename i915_runtime_pm

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-05-17 16:27:26)
> 
> 
> On 5/16/19 3:42 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-05-16 23:10:10)
> >> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-05-16 23:07:43)
> >>> Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-05-16 22:56:31)
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> >>>> index b964ca7af9c8..0e3817f9785e 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> >>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >>>>   #ifndef __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
> >>>>   #define __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
> >>>>   
> >>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >>>
> >>> There doesn't seem to be any peeking into struct device, so do we not
> >>> just need the struct device forward decl here?
> 
> True, will fix.
> 
> >>
> >> And add it to Makefile.headers_test
> > 
> > Hint: we may need to split out intel_display_power.[ch]
> > 
> 
> Should I add intel_display_power.h to Makefile.headers_test as well? It 
> does compile on its own, but it'll have to include intel_display.h, 
> which isn't on the list.

Yes. If we have to include intel_display.h, that means whenever we get
around to splitting intel_display.h, we will remember to update
intel_display_power.h. Rainy day tasks will be to delete #include at
random and see which are still required in headers.
-Chris