[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix the interpretation of MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED bit inorder to pass Link Layer compliance test number 400.3.1.15

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue May 21 13:24:58 UTC 2019


On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Khaled Almahallawy wrote:
> According to DP 1.4 standard, if the source supports four pre-emphasis levels, then the source shall set the bit MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED = 1 only when trasmitter programmed PRE-EMPHASIS_SET field (bits 4:3) to 11b (Level 3). Pre-emphasis level 3 is the maximum pre-emphasis level that the source supports.
> Currently the MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED bit is interpreted as the Max Pre-Emphasis level for certain Swing Level. This interpretation fails Link Layer compliance test 400.3.1.15 step 17 according to the following Fail condition: TRAINING_LANEx_SET.MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED = 1 (check all active lanes) and the Source DUT supports pre-emphasis level 3 (9.5db).

Hmm. I guess that's correct. The spec doesn't say anything about
per-vswing pre-emphasis when talking about the 'max reached' bit.

> 
> Cc: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor at intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 20 --------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 0af47f343faa..6540c979c098 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2239,26 +2239,6 @@ u8 intel_ddi_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  		DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * We assume that the full set of pre-emphasis values can be
> - * used on all DDI platforms. Should that change we need to
> - * rethink this code.
> - */
> -u8 intel_ddi_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_encoder *encoder, u8 voltage_swing)
> -{
> -	switch (voltage_swing & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) {
> -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0:
> -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3;
> -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_1:
> -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2;
> -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_2:
> -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1;
> -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_3:
> -	default:
> -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void cnl_ddi_vswing_program(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  				   int level, enum intel_output_type type)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 77ba4da6b981..f94759e45862 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@ intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 voltage_swing)
>  	enum port port = encoder->port;
>  
>  	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> -		return intel_ddi_dp_pre_emphasis_max(encoder, voltage_swing);
> +		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3;

We're going to have to change this for all platforms.

Also we need to update the code to pick the correct swing/pre-emphasis
when we can't do what is being requested.

The spec says:
"When the combination of the requested pre-emphasis level and voltage
 swing exceeds the capability of a DPTX, the DPTX shall set the pre-emphasis
 level according to the request and use the highest voltage swing it can
 output with the given pre-emphasis level."
and
"When a DPTX reads a request beyond the limits of this Standard, the
 DPTX shall set the pre-emphasis level according to the request and set
 the highest voltage swing level it can output with the given pre-emphasis
 level. If a DPTX is requested for 9.5dB of pre-emphasis level (may be 
 supported for a DPTX) and cannot support that level, it shall set the
 pre-emphasis level to the next highest level, 6dB."



>  	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>  		switch (voltage_swing & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) {
>  		case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0:
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list