[Intel-gfx] [v6][PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Add intel_color_lut_equal() to compare hw and sw gamma/degamma lut values

Sharma, Swati2 swati2.sharma at intel.com
Tue May 21 13:42:28 UTC 2019


On 14-May-19 9:40 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:

> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:13:21PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
>> v3: -Rebase
>> v4: -Renamed intel_compare_color_lut() to intel_color_lut_equal() [Jani]
>>      -Added the default label above the correct label [Jani]
>>      -Corrected smatch warn "variable dereferenced before check" [Dan Carpenter]
>> v5: -Added condition (!blob1 && !blob2) return true [Jani]
>>      -Called PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT inside if (!adjust) [Jani]
>>      -Added #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT [Jani]
>> v6: -Added func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to get bit precision for
>>       gamma and degamma lut readout depending upon platform and
>>       corresponding to load_luts() [Ankit]
>>      -Added debug log for color para in intel_dump_pipe_config [Jani]
>>      -Made patch11 as patch3 [Jani]
>>
>> I could think of adding intel_color_get_bit_precision() to be the way
>> to get away with bit precision problem for degamma and gamma (its like a table
>> having hard coded values depening on gamma_mode).
>> If anybody could think of better way then this then please guide.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c   | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h   |  7 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 24 ++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> index 50b98ee..1e60369 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> @@ -1251,6 +1251,99 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +void intel_color_get_bit_precision(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int *bp_gamma)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> +
>> +	if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>> +		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>> +			if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT) {
>> +				*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +				return;
> Functions can actually return values.
>
> Not sure I particularly like this function though. We can't fit
> the gamma vs. degamm stuff in here neatly. I think per-platform
> stuff to determine the precision is required to make this sane.
> And it should probably got into intel_color.c to keep things
> neatly contained.
>
> Something along the lines of:
>
> i9xx_gamma_precision()
> {
> 	if (!gamma_enable)
> 		return 0;
>
> 	switch (gamma_mode) {
> 	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> 		return 8;
> 	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> 		return 16;
> 	}
> }
>
> chv_gamma_precision()
> {
> 	if (cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
> 		return 10;
> 	else
> 		return i9xx_gamma_precision();
> }
>
> chv_degamma_precision(crtc_state)
> {
> 	if (cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_DEGAMMA)
> 		return 14;
> 	else
> 		return 0
> }
>
> ilk_gamma_precision()
> {
> 	if (!gamma_enable)
> 		return 0;
>
> 	if ((csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
> 		return 0;
>
> 	switch (gamma_mode) {
> 	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> 		return 8;
> 	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> 		return 10;
> 	}
> }
>
> ilk_degamma_precision()
> {
> 	if (!gamma_enable)
> 		return 0;
>
> 	if ((csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) != 0)
> 		return 0;
>
> 	switch (gamma_mode) {
> 	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> 		return 8;
> 	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> 		return 10;
> 	}
> }
>
> ... extend to ivb, glk, and icl variants too.

ok..will do like this. thanks! sorry i was on leave.
2 queries:
(1) Since intel_color_get_bit_precision() will be used to set bit precision for gamma and degamma both, it will
     return multiple values..should i return values as struct? or sending as pointer is ok?
	if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
			*bp_gamma = chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
(2) (or) if this method is not fine, should we have function ptr for the same?
Please suggest the best method?

>
>> +			}
>> +			if (crtc_state->cgm_mode == CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 10;
>> +		} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4) {
>> +			if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +			else
>> +				*bp_gamma = 16;
>> +		} else {
>> +			*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
>> +			if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
>> +					GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +			else
>> +				*bp_gamma = 10;
>> +		} else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
>> +			if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +			else
>> +				*bp_gamma = 10;
>> +		} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7) {
>> +			if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +			else if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_SPLIT)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 10;
>> +				else
>> +					*bp_gamma = 10;
>> +		} else {
>> +			if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> +				*bp_gamma = 8;
>> +			else
>> +				*bp_gamma = 10;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool err_check(struct drm_color_lut *sw_lut,
>> +	                     struct drm_color_lut *hw_lut, u32 err)
>> +{
>> +	 return ((abs((long)hw_lut->red - sw_lut->red)) <= err) &&
>> +	        ((abs((long)hw_lut->blue - sw_lut->blue)) <= err) &&
>> +	        ((abs((long)hw_lut->green - sw_lut->green)) <= err);
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>> +			   struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
>> +			   u32 bit_precision)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_color_lut *sw_lut, *hw_lut;
>> +	int sw_lut_size, hw_lut_size, i;
>> +	u32 err;
>> +
>> +	if (!blob1 && !blob2)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	if (!blob1)
>> +		return true;
>> +
>> +	if (!blob2)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	sw_lut_size = drm_color_lut_size(blob1);
>> +	hw_lut_size = drm_color_lut_size(blob2);
>> +
>> +	if (sw_lut_size != hw_lut_size)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	sw_lut = blob1->data;
>> +	hw_lut = blob2->data;
>> +
>> +	err = 0xffff >> bit_precision;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < sw_lut_size; i++) {
>> +		 if (!err_check(&hw_lut[i], &sw_lut[i], err))
>> +			return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h
>> index 057e8ac..f2872d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h
>> @@ -6,13 +6,20 @@
>>   #ifndef __INTEL_COLOR_H__
>>   #define __INTEL_COLOR_H__
>>   
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>>   struct intel_crtc_state;
>>   struct intel_crtc;
>> +struct drm_property_blob;
>>   
>>   void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>>   int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>   void intel_color_commit(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>   void intel_color_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>   void intel_color_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> +bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>> +			   struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
>> +			   u32 bit_precision);
>> +void intel_color_get_bit_precision(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int *bp_gamma);
>>   
>>   #endif /* __INTEL_COLOR_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 3e01028..46985c15 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -11570,6 +11570,16 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>   				      drm_rect_width(&state->base.dst),
>>   				      drm_rect_height(&state->base.dst));
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cgm_mode:%d gamma_mode:%d gamma_enable:%d csc_enable:%d\n",
>> +			       pipe_config->cgm_mode, pipe_config->gamma_mode, pipe_config->gamma_enable,
>> +			       pipe_config->csc_enable);
>> +	else
>> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("csc_mode:%d gamma_mode:%d gamma_enable:%d csc_enable:%d\n",
>> +			       pipe_config->csc_mode, pipe_config->gamma_mode, pipe_config->gamma_enable,
>> +			       pipe_config->csc_enable);
>> +
>>   }
>>   
>>   static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>> @@ -11947,6 +11957,7 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   			  bool adjust)
>>   {
>>   	bool ret = true;
>> +	u32 bp_gamma = 0;
>>   	bool fixup_inherited = adjust &&
>>   		(current_config->base.mode.private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED) &&
>>   		!(pipe_config->base.mode.private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED);
>> @@ -12098,6 +12109,15 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   	} \
>>   } while (0)
>>   
>> +#define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(name, bit_precision) do { \
>> +	if (!intel_color_lut_equal(current_config->name, \
>> +				   pipe_config->name, bit_precision)) { \
>> +		pipe_config_err(adjust, __stringify(name), \
>> +				"hw_state doesn't match sw_state\n"); \
>> +		ret = false; \
>> +	} \
>> +} while (0)
>> +
>>   #define PIPE_CONF_QUIRK(quirk) \
>>   	((current_config->quirks | pipe_config->quirks) & (quirk))
>>   
>> @@ -12193,6 +12213,9 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   			PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(csc_mode);
>>   		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(gamma_enable);
>>   		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(csc_enable);
>> +
>> +		intel_color_get_bit_precision(pipe_config, &bp_gamma);
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(base.gamma_lut, bp_gamma);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(double_wide);
>> @@ -12255,6 +12278,7 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS
>>   #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY
>>   #undef PIPE_CONF_QUIRK
>> +#undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT
>>   
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1


-- 
~Swati Sharma

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20190521/80c7aa08/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list