[Intel-gfx] [18/21] drm/i915: extract intel_runtime_pm.h from intel_drv.h

[Nathan Chancellor]

Hi Jani,

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:29:36PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
> intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
> header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
> modularity of the driver.
> 
> Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
> includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
> only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
> and as needed.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---

<snip>

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000..692277
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
> +#define __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/stackdepot.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct drm_i915_private;
> +
> +typedef depot_stack_handle_t intel_wakeref_t;

Just as an FYI, this particular change causes a slew of clang warnings:
https://travis-ci.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/201754420#L2435

I am not sure how exactly you'd like this resolved so I didn't want to
provide a useless patch. I figured I would let you know about it and
leave it up to you.

Cheers,
Nathan