[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 14/15] gem_wsim: Fix prng usage
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed May 22 15:57:19 UTC 2019
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Back when gem_wsim used forking it was safe to use the common storage
prng, but after converting to threads it no longer is.
Fix by storing and using a new per workload seed for batch buffer
duration randomness.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
index 0ccb271575f7..c43bbbc8c94d 100644
--- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
+++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ struct workload
unsigned int flags;
bool print_stats;
+ uint32_t bb_prng;
uint32_t prng;
struct timespec repeat_start;
@@ -240,6 +241,8 @@ struct workload
static const unsigned int nop_calibration_us = 1000;
static unsigned long nop_calibration;
+static unsigned int master_prng;
+
static unsigned int context_vcs_rr;
static int verbose = 1;
@@ -1067,14 +1070,14 @@ clone_workload(struct workload *_wrk)
#define PAGE_SIZE (4096)
#endif
-static unsigned int get_duration(struct w_step *w)
+static unsigned int get_duration(struct workload *wrk, struct w_step *w)
{
struct duration *dur = &w->duration;
if (dur->min == dur->max)
return dur->min;
else
- return dur->min + hars_petruska_f54_1_random_unsafe() %
+ return dur->min + hars_petruska_f54_1_random(&wrk->bb_prng) %
(dur->max + 1 - dur->min);
}
@@ -1448,6 +1451,7 @@ prepare_workload(unsigned int id, struct workload *wrk, unsigned int flags)
wrk->id = id;
wrk->prng = rand();
+ wrk->bb_prng = (wrk->flags & SYNCEDCLIENTS) ? master_prng : rand();
wrk->run = true;
ctx_vcs = 0;
@@ -2607,7 +2611,7 @@ do_eb(struct workload *wrk, struct w_step *w, enum intel_engine_id engine,
w->eb.batch_start_offset =
w->unbound_duration ?
0 :
- ALIGN(w->bb_sz - get_bb_sz(get_duration(w)),
+ ALIGN(w->bb_sz - get_bb_sz(get_duration(wrk, w)),
2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
for (i = 0; i < w->fence_deps.nr; i++) {
@@ -2676,9 +2680,6 @@ static void *run_workload(void *data)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t_start);
- hars_petruska_f54_1_random_seed((wrk->flags & SYNCEDCLIENTS) ?
- 0 : wrk->id);
-
init_status_page(wrk, INIT_ALL);
for (count = 0; wrk->run && (wrk->background || count < wrk->repeat);
count++) {
@@ -3117,6 +3118,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
init_clocks();
+ master_prng = time(NULL);
+ srand(master_prng);
+ master_prng = rand();
+
while ((c = getopt(argc, argv,
"hqv2RsSHxGdc:n:r:w:W:a:t:b:p:")) != -1) {
switch (c) {
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list