[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915: Improve static engine map for legacy

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu May 23 09:14:41 UTC 2019


Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-05-23 10:09:48)
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-23 09:46:08)
> > 
> > On 23/05/2019 09:06, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >   const struct intel_execution_engine2 intel_execution_engines2[] = {
> > > -     { "rcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER, 0 },
> > > -     { "bcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY, 0 },
> > > -     { "vcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 0 },
> > > -     { "vcs1", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 1 },
> > > -     { "vcs2", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 2 },
> > > -     { "vecs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE, 0 },
> > > +     { "rcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER },
> > > +     { "bcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY, 0, I915_EXEC_BLT },
> > > +     { "vcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 0, I915_EXEC_BSD | I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1 },
> > 
> > execbuf will reject this on single vcs parts. :( Am I not seeing some 
> > place where you fudge it into compliance?
> 
> 
>         if (user_ring_id == I915_EXEC_BSD && HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, VCS1)) {
>                 unsigned int bsd_idx = args->flags & I915_EXEC_BSD_MASK;
> 
>                 if (bsd_idx == I915_EXEC_BSD_DEFAULT) {
>                         bsd_idx = gen8_dispatch_bsd_engine(dev_priv, file);
>                 } else if (bsd_idx >= I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1 &&
>                            bsd_idx <= I915_EXEC_BSD_RING2) {
>                         bsd_idx >>= I915_EXEC_BSD_SHIFT;
>                         bsd_idx--;
>                 } else {
>                         DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown bsd ring: %u\n",
>                                   bsd_idx);
>                         return NULL;
>                 }
> 
>                 engine = dev_priv->engine[_VCS(bsd_idx)];
>         } else {
>                 engine = dev_priv->engine[user_ring_map[user_ring_id]];
>         }
> 
> Looks ok to me... I was trying to double check but dif didn't boot on
> bsw. Sigh.

So instead I removed vcs1 from bdw, and vcs0 continues to work.

What is still incorrect though:
$ ./build/tests/gem_exec_parallel --list-subtests
...
vcs0
vcs0-contexts
vcs0-fds
vcs1
vcs1-contexts
vcs1-fds
vcs2
vcs2-contexts
vcs2-fds
...

$ sudo ./build/tests/gem_exec_parallel --run vcs1
IGT-Version: 1.23-g82137ba4 (x86_64) (Linux: 5.2.0-rc1+ x86_64)
(gem_exec_parallel:16219) igt_core-WARNING: Unknown subtest: vcs1

-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list