[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915: Improve static engine map for legacy
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu May 23 09:27:49 UTC 2019
On 23/05/2019 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-23 09:46:08)
>>
>> On 23/05/2019 09:06, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> const struct intel_execution_engine2 intel_execution_engines2[] = {
>>> - { "rcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER, 0 },
>>> - { "bcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY, 0 },
>>> - { "vcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 0 },
>>> - { "vcs1", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 1 },
>>> - { "vcs2", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 2 },
>>> - { "vecs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE, 0 },
>>> + { "rcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER },
>>> + { "bcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY, 0, I915_EXEC_BLT },
>>> + { "vcs0", I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO, 0, I915_EXEC_BSD | I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1 },
>>
>> execbuf will reject this on single vcs parts. :( Am I not seeing some
>> place where you fudge it into compliance?
>
>
> if (user_ring_id == I915_EXEC_BSD && HAS_ENGINE(dev_priv, VCS1)) {
> unsigned int bsd_idx = args->flags & I915_EXEC_BSD_MASK;
>
> if (bsd_idx == I915_EXEC_BSD_DEFAULT) {
> bsd_idx = gen8_dispatch_bsd_engine(dev_priv, file);
> } else if (bsd_idx >= I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1 &&
> bsd_idx <= I915_EXEC_BSD_RING2) {
> bsd_idx >>= I915_EXEC_BSD_SHIFT;
> bsd_idx--;
> } else {
> DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown bsd ring: %u\n",
> bsd_idx);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> engine = dev_priv->engine[_VCS(bsd_idx)];
> } else {
> engine = dev_priv->engine[user_ring_map[user_ring_id]];
> }
>
> Looks ok to me... I was trying to double check but dif didn't boot on
> bsw. Sigh.
Hmm I would have sworn we used to do that.. strange. Okay, I'll re-read
your patch. Notice that I did not know you are working on it so have
sent my own fix at similar time.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list