[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Thu May 23 16:10:39 UTC 2019


On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:54 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:51:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   8122de54602e ("dt-bindings: Convert vendor prefixes to json-schema")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commits:
> >
> >   b4a2c0055a4f ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for VXT Ltd")
> >   b1b0d36bdb15 ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: simple: Add binding for TFC S9700RTWV43TR-01B")
> >   fbd8b69ab616 ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for Evervision Electronics")
> >
> > from the drm-misc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I deleted the file and added the patch below) and can
> > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> I just took your patch and pushed a temp branch there:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mripard/linux.git/commit/?h=drm-misc-next&id=3832f2cad5307ebcedeead13fbd8d3cf06ba5e90
>
> Rob, Stephen, are you ok with the change? If so, I'll push it.

The 'tfc' line is missing a ':' on the end. Does the file pass
dt_binding_check like that?

Rob


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list