[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Remove unwanted rcu_read_lock/unlock

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Niranjana Vishwanathapura (2019-11-06 00:02:03)
> We don't need rcu read side critical section to call pid_nr(),
> remove it.
> 
> Cc: Chris P Wilson <chris.p.wilson at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index e8b67f5e521d..1f2f266f26af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -1230,10 +1230,7 @@ static void record_request(const struct i915_request *request,
>         erq->start = i915_ggtt_offset(request->ring->vma);
>         erq->head = request->head;
>         erq->tail = request->tail;
> -
> -       rcu_read_lock();
>         erq->pid = ctx->pid ? pid_nr(ctx->pid) : 0;
> -       rcu_read_unlock();

Ok, that was just cut'n'paste from pid_task()
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson at intel.com>
-Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.