[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC method to determine if submission is active.
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Thu Nov 7 00:13:48 UTC 2019
On 11/6/19 9:40 AM, don.hiatt at intel.com wrote:
> From: Don Hiatt <don.hiatt at intel.com>
>
> Add intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() function to determine if
> GuC submission is active. Based on code by Michal Wajdeczko.
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Hiatt <don.hiatt at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 2498c55e0ea5..0aaef7c07879 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static void guc_interrupts_release(struct intel_gt *gt)
> rps->pm_intrmsk_mbz &= ~ARAT_EXPIRED_INTRMSK;
> }
>
> -static void guc_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +void guc_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> /*
> * We inherit a bunch of functions from execlists that we'd like
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h
> index 54d716828352..a0132f061ebc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h
> @@ -63,5 +63,6 @@ void intel_guc_submission_disable(struct intel_guc *guc);
> void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc);
> int intel_guc_preempt_work_create(struct intel_guc *guc);
> void intel_guc_preempt_work_destroy(struct intel_guc *guc);
> +void guc_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 7e0f67babe20..878d574bb1c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -78,8 +78,10 @@
>
> #include "gt/intel_lrc.h"
> #include "gt/intel_engine.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt_types.h"
> #include "gt/intel_workarounds.h"
> +#include "gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h"
> #include "gt/uc/intel_uc.h"
>
> #include "intel_device_info.h"
> @@ -2032,4 +2034,16 @@ i915_coherent_map_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> return HAS_LLC(i915) ? I915_MAP_WB : I915_MAP_WC;
> }
>
> +static inline bool intel_guc_submission_is_enabled(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + enum intel_engine_id id;
> +
> + for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
> + return engine->set_default_submission ==
> + guc_set_default_submission;
> + return false;
It feels weird that we need to go look into the engines to understand if
GuC submission is enabled or not. One of the patches I've sent earlier
today ("drm/i915/guc: kill doorbell code and selftests") makes it so
that intel_guc_submission_enable() can't fail, so after that it should
be possible to have something like:
bool intel_guc_submission_is_enabled(struct intel_guc *guc) {
return intel_guc_is_submission_supported(guc) &&
intel_guc_is_running(guc);
}
AFAICS, even without my patch we do sanitize the GuC is
intel_guc_submission_enable() fails, so the above should still work. If
something like this doesn't fly, my preference would be to set something
in intel_guc_submission_enable and check that instead of going inside
the engines.
Michal, any input here?
Thanks,
Daniele
> +}
> +
> #endif
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list