[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pmu: "Frequency" is reported as accumulated cycles
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 11 09:11:03 UTC 2019
On 09/11/2019 10:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We report "frequencies" (actual-frequency, requested-frequency) as the
> number of accumulated cycles so that the average frequency over that
> period may be determined by the user. This means the units we report to
> the user are Mcycles (or just M), not MHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> index 4804775644bf..9b02be0ad4e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> @@ -908,8 +908,8 @@ create_event_attributes(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> const char *name;
> const char *unit;
> } events[] = {
> - __event(I915_PMU_ACTUAL_FREQUENCY, "actual-frequency", "MHz"),
> - __event(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY, "requested-frequency", "MHz"),
> + __event(I915_PMU_ACTUAL_FREQUENCY, "actual-frequency", "M"),
> + __event(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY, "requested-frequency", "M"),
> __event(I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS, "interrupts", NULL),
> __event(I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY, "rc6-residency", "ns"),
> };
>
MHz was wrong yes. But is 'M' established or would 'Mcycles' be better?
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list