[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/7] tests/i915: Skip if secure batches is not available
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 13 15:49:10 UTC 2019
From: "Kuoppala, Mika" <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
If we can't do secure execbuf, there is no point in trying.
Signed-off-by: Kuoppala, Mika <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
tests/perf_pmu.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
index 8f15e645..c5517b07 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_params.c
@@ -193,6 +193,19 @@ static void test_batch_first(int fd)
gem_close(fd, obj[0].handle);
}
+static int has_secure_batches(const int fd)
+{
+ int v = -1;
+ drm_i915_getparam_t gp;
+
+ gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_SECURE_BATCHES;
+ gp.value = &v;
+
+ igt_assert_eq(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp), 0);
+
+ return v;
+}
+
struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 gem_exec[1];
uint32_t batch[2] = {MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END};
@@ -340,6 +353,8 @@ igt_main
}
igt_subtest("secure-non-root") {
+ igt_require(has_secure_batches(fd));
+
igt_fork(child, 1) {
igt_drop_root();
@@ -352,6 +367,7 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("secure-non-master") {
igt_require(__igt_device_set_master(fd) == 0); /* Requires root privilege */
+ igt_require(has_secure_batches(fd));
igt_device_drop_master(fd);
execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | I915_EXEC_SECURE;
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c b/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c
index fc2ccb21..82eb8a3f 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c
@@ -225,6 +225,19 @@ static uint32_t get_engine_base(int fd, uint32_t engine)
}
}
+static int has_secure_batches(const int fd)
+{
+ int v = -1;
+ drm_i915_getparam_t gp;
+
+ gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_SECURE_BATCHES;
+ gp.value = &v;
+
+ igt_assert_eq(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp), 0);
+
+ return v;
+}
+
#define MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_64_BIT_ADDR ((0x24 << 23) | 2)
static int create_read_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *reloc,
@@ -566,6 +579,7 @@ igt_main
igt_require_gem(fd);
gem_require_mocs_registers(fd);
igt_require(get_mocs_settings(fd, &table, false));
+ igt_require(has_secure_batches(fd));
}
for (e = intel_execution_engines; e->name; e++) {
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index e2bd2cc5..296d04c6 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -893,6 +893,16 @@ static int wait_vblank(int fd, union drm_wait_vblank *vbl)
return err;
}
+static int has_secure_batches(const int fd)
+{
+ int v = -1;
+ drm_i915_getparam_t gp;
+ gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_SECURE_BATCHES;
+ gp.value = &v;
+ igt_assert_eq(drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp), 0);
+ return v;
+}
+
static void
event_wait(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
{
@@ -910,6 +920,7 @@ event_wait(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
devid = intel_get_drm_devid(gem_fd);
igt_require(intel_gen(devid) >= 7);
+ igt_require(has_secure_batches(fd));
igt_skip_on(IS_VALLEYVIEW(devid) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(devid));
kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
--
2.17.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list