[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Reduce flush_ggtt() from a wait-for-idle to a mere barrier flush
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Nov 20 13:41:13 UTC 2019
Since we use barriers, we need only explicitly flush those barriers to
ensure tha we can reclaim the available ggtt for ourselves. The barrier
flush was implicit inside the intel_gt_wait_for_idle() -- except because
we use i915_gem_evict from inside an active timeline during execbuf, we
could easily end up waiting upon ourselves.
Fixes: 7936a22dd466 ("drm/i915/gt: Wait for new requests in intel_gt_retire_requests()")
Fixes: a46bfdc83fee ("drm/i915/gt: Wait for new requests in intel_gt_retire_requests()")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_reloc/basic-range
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
index 7e62c310290f..78ca56c06a3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
-#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
+#include "gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.h"
#include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
@@ -38,8 +38,11 @@ I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static struct igt_evict_ctl {
bool fail_if_busy:1;
} igt_evict_ctl;)
-static int ggtt_flush(struct intel_gt *gt)
+static void ggtt_flush(struct intel_gt *gt)
{
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ enum intel_engine_id id;
+
/*
* Not everything in the GGTT is tracked via vma (otherwise we
* could evict as required with minimal stalling) so we are forced
@@ -47,7 +50,11 @@ static int ggtt_flush(struct intel_gt *gt)
* the hopes that we can then remove contexts and the like only
* bound by their active reference.
*/
- return intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ intel_gt_retire_requests(gt);
+ for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
+ intel_engine_flush_barriers(engine);
+
+ cond_resched();
}
static bool
@@ -197,11 +204,7 @@ i915_gem_evict_something(struct i915_address_space *vm,
if (I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(igt_evict_ctl.fail_if_busy))
return -EBUSY;
- ret = ggtt_flush(vm->gt);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- cond_resched();
+ ggtt_flush(vm->gt);
flags |= PIN_NONBLOCK;
goto search_again;
@@ -371,11 +374,8 @@ int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm)
* pin themselves inside the global GTT and performing the
* switch otherwise is ineffective.
*/
- if (i915_is_ggtt(vm)) {
- ret = ggtt_flush(vm->gt);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
+ if (i915_is_ggtt(vm))
+ ggtt_flush(vm->gt);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eviction_list);
list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->bound_list, vm_link) {
--
2.24.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list