[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1604555607
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 22 09:21:45 UTC 2019
On 22/11/2019 04:02, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>
> Implement Wa_1604555607 (set the DS pairing timer to 128 cycles).
> FF_MODE2 is part of the register state context, that's why it is
> implemented here.
>
> At TGL A0 stepping, FF_MODE2 register read back is broken, hence
> disabling the WA verification.
>
> v2: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring (Oscar)
> v3: Correctly add to ctx_workarounds_init (Michel)
> v4:
> uncore read is used [Tvrtko]
> Macros as used for MASK definition [Chris]
> v5:
> Skip the Wa_1604555607 verification [Ram]
> i915 ptr retrieved from engine. [Tvrtko]
> v6:
> __wa_write_masked_or used with varying parameter [Tvrtko]
> Added wa_add as a wrapper for __wa_add [Chris]
> v7:
> WA verification is skipped on all stepping as of now [Lucas]
>
> BSpec: 19363
> HSDES: 1604555607
> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramlingam.c at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> [v5]
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 +++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 399acae2f33f..b11540caa92d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -146,20 +146,33 @@ static void _wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa)
> }
> }
>
> -static void
> -wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
> - u32 val)
> +static void wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
> + u32 val, u32 read_mask)
> {
> struct i915_wa wa = {
> .reg = reg,
> .mask = mask,
> .val = val,
> - .read = mask,
> + .read = read_mask,
> };
>
> _wa_add(wal, &wa);
> }
>
> +static void
> +__wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
> + u32 val, u32 read_mask)
> +{
> + wa_add(wal, reg, mask, val, read_mask);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
> + u32 val)
> +{
> + __wa_write_masked_or(wal, reg, mask, val, mask);
Minor point - not sure about the need for this helper now, you could
just call wa_add from here.
> +}
> +
> static void
> wa_masked_en(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
> {
> @@ -568,9 +581,22 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> {
> + u32 val;
> +
> /* Wa_1409142259:tgl */
> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
> GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
> +
> + /* Wa_1604555607:tgl */
> + val = intel_uncore_read(engine->uncore, FF_MODE2);
> + val &= ~FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK;
> + val |= FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128;
> + /*
> + * FIXME: FF_MODE2 register is not readable till TGL B0. We can
> + * enable verification of WA from the later steppings, which enables
> + * the read of FF_MODE2.
> + */
> + __wa_write_masked_or(wal, FF_MODE2, FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, val, 0);
If I was a betting man I'd bet no one will ever remember to add the
verification back. So I have to say I disagree with Lucas on this point.
Someone do a casting vote please. :)
We know it will remain broken until at least after B0?
> }
>
> static void
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 94d0f593eeb7..a99fdf8ea53b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -7922,6 +7922,10 @@ enum {
> #define PIXEL_ROUNDING_TRUNC_FB_PASSTHRU (1 << 15)
> #define PER_PIXEL_ALPHA_BYPASS_EN (1 << 7)
>
> +#define FF_MODE2 _MMIO(0x6604)
> +#define FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128 REG_FIELD_PREP(FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK, 4)
> +
> /* PCH */
>
> #define PCH_DISPLAY_BASE 0xc0000u
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list