[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the correct PCH transcoder for LPT/WPT in intel_sanitize_frame_start_delay()

Shankar, Uma uma.shankar at intel.com
Fri Nov 29 11:56:42 UTC 2019



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shankar, Uma
>Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 5:18 PM
>To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the correct PCH transcoder for LPT/WPT in
>intel_sanitize_frame_start_delay()
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 11:54 PM
>>To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>Cc: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar at intel.com>
>>Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the correct PCH transcoder for LPT/WPT
>>in
>>intel_sanitize_frame_start_delay()
>>
>>From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>
>>LPT/WPT only have PCH transcoder A. Make sure we poke at its chicken
>>register instead of some non-existent register when FDI is being driven by pipe B or
>C.
>
>Change looks good to me.
>Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
>
>>Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>index 53dc310a5f6d..f99dbc3d9696 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>@@ -17272,7 +17272,8 @@ static void
>>intel_sanitize_frame_start_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc
>> 		val |= TRANS_FRAME_START_DELAY(0);
>> 		I915_WRITE(reg, val);
>> 	} else {
>>-		i915_reg_t reg = TRANS_CHICKEN2(crtc->pipe);
>>+		enum pipe pch_transcoder = intel_crtc_pch_transcoder(crtc);

Just an afterthought, not sure if this hold generically for all pipes or is it programmable
only for PIPE_A. Making it enabled on PIPE_A when actually pipe B or C is used, is it the right
thing. Should we discard programming this for PIPE B and C altogether.

>>+		i915_reg_t reg = TRANS_CHICKEN2(pch_transcoder);
>> 		u32 val;
>>
>> 		val = I915_READ(reg);
>>--
>>2.23.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list