[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/i915/display/icl: HW state readout for transcoder port sync config
Manasi Navare
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Mon Oct 7 03:31:48 UTC 2019
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 05:21:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:11:10PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > After the state is committed, we readout the HW registers and compare
> > the HW state with the SW state that we just committed.
> > For Transcdoer port sync, we add master_transcoder and the
> > salves bitmask to the crtc_state, hence we need to read those during
> > the HW state readout to avoid pipe state mismatch.
> >
> > v6:
> > * Go through both parts of HW readout (Maarten)
> > * Add a WARN if the same trans configured as
> > master and slave (Ville, Maarten)
> > v5:
> > * Add return INVALID in defaut case (Maarten)
> > v4:
> > * Get power domains in master loop for get_config (Ville)
> > v3:
> > * Add TRANSCODER_D (Maarten)
> > * v3 Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > v2:
> > * Add Transcoder_D and MISSING_CASE (Maarten)
> >
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index af6b8f10f132..6e4af6ded6f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -10510,6 +10510,72 @@ static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static enum transcoder transcoder_master(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> > +{
> > + u32 trans_port_sync, master_select;
> > +
> > + trans_port_sync = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL2(cpu_transcoder));
> > +
> > + if ((trans_port_sync & PORT_SYNC_MODE_ENABLE) == 0)
> > + return INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> > +
> > + master_select = trans_port_sync &
> > + PORT_SYNC_MODE_MASTER_SELECT_MASK;
> > + switch (master_select) {
> > + case 1:
> > + return TRANSCODER_A;
> > + case 2:
> > + return TRANSCODER_B;
> > + case 3:
> > + return TRANSCODER_C;
> > + case 4:
> > + return TRANSCODER_D;
>
> Missing EDP. Also A-D are just master_select-1
Yes will just derive it as master_Select -1 and for 0, i will
set it to EDP
That should work right?
>
> > + default:
> > + MISSING_CASE(master_select);
> > + return INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void icelake_get_trans_port_sync_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>
> s/pipe_config/crtc_state/
>
Ok
> 'crtc' argument can be derived so doesn't need to be passed in.
>
Ok will remove that
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > + u32 transcoders;
> > + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder;
> > +
> > + pipe_config->master_transcoder = transcoder_master(dev_priv,
> > + pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> > + if (pipe_config->master_transcoder != INVALID_TRANSCODER)
> > + pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask = 0;
>
> Zeroing seems redundant.
Just for safer side since we want the bitmask to be 0 for slaves
But I guess it will be initialized to 0 anyways right so no need to set it to 0?
MAnasi
>
> > +
> > + transcoders = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) |
> > + BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
> > + BIT(TRANSCODER_C) |
> > + BIT(TRANSCODER_D);
> > + for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder, transcoders) {
> > + enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> > + intel_wakeref_t trans_wakeref;
> > +
> > + power_domain = POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(cpu_transcoder);
> > + trans_wakeref = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(dev_priv,
> > + power_domain);
> > +
> > + if (!trans_wakeref)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (transcoder_master(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder) ==
> > + pipe_config->cpu_transcoder)
> > + pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
> > +
> > + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain, trans_wakeref);
> > + }
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(pipe_config->master_transcoder != INVALID_TRANSCODER &&
> > + pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> > {
> > @@ -10629,6 +10695,9 @@ static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 1;
> > }
> >
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > + icelake_get_trans_port_sync_config(crtc, pipe_config);
> > +
> > out:
> > for_each_power_domain(power_domain, power_domain_mask)
> > intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> > --
> > 2.19.1
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list