[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_userptr: Be defensive when testing userptr capabilities

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 07/10/2019 08:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Not every device naturally supports snooping and userptr, so be prepared
> for the initial probe to fail.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111910
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c | 7 +++++--
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> index 2359c13f4..18e806fed 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_userptr_blits.c
> @@ -78,12 +78,14 @@ static uint32_t linear[WIDTH*HEIGHT];
>   
>   static bool has_gtt_mmap(int i915)
>   {
> -	void *ptr, *map;
> +	void *ptr, *map = NULL;
>   	uint32_t handle;
>   
>   	igt_assert(posix_memalign(&ptr, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
>   
> -	gem_userptr(i915, ptr, 4096, 0, 0, &handle);
> +	if (__gem_userptr(i915, ptr, 4096, 0,
> +			  LOCAL_I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED, &handle))
> +		goto out_ptr;
>   	igt_assert(handle != 0);
>   
>   	map = __gem_mmap__gtt(i915, handle, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
> @@ -91,6 +93,7 @@ static bool has_gtt_mmap(int i915)
>   		munmap(map, 4096);
>   
>   	gem_close(i915, handle);
> +out_ptr:
>   	free(ptr);
>   
>   	return map != NULL;
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko