[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/i915: Bump conservative threshold for ring size

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 07/10/2019 09:27, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We are still hitting the occasional stall upon submission, so be extra
> caution and leave one more spare.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   lib/i915/gem_ring.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/i915/gem_ring.c b/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
> index 272264659..9f099edff 100644
> --- a/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
> +++ b/lib/i915/gem_ring.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ __gem_measure_ring_inflight(int fd, unsigned int engine, enum measure_ring_flags
>   	} while (1);
>   
>   	igt_assert_eq(__execbuf(fd, &execbuf), -EINTR);
> -	igt_assert(count > 1);
> +	igt_assert(count > 2);
>   
>   	memset(&itv, 0, sizeof(itv));
>   	setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &itv, NULL);
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ __gem_measure_ring_inflight(int fd, unsigned int engine, enum measure_ring_flags
>   	gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
>   
>   	/* Be conservative in case we must wrap later */
> -	return count - 1;
> +	return count - 2;
>   }
>   
>   /**
> 

Will one make a difference?

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko