[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Check that registers are preserved between virtual engines

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 10 12:31:04 UTC 2019


On 10/10/2019 12:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Make sure that we copy across the registers from one engine to the next,
> as we hop around a virtual engine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> Skip the test on gen8 as the context image is devoid of CS_GPR.
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 180 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 180 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> index 198cf2f754f4..9ee1fdd16aff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> @@ -1952,6 +1952,33 @@ static int live_virtual_engine(void *arg)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static struct i915_vma *create_scratch(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> +	struct i915_vma *vma;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(gt->i915, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	if (IS_ERR(obj))
> +		return ERR_CAST(obj);
> +
> +	i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, I915_CACHING_CACHED);
> +
> +	vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, &gt->ggtt->vm, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> +		i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> +		return vma;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, PIN_GLOBAL);
> +	if (err) {
> +		i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> +		return ERR_PTR(err);
> +	}
> +
> +	return vma;
> +}
> +
>   static int mask_virtual_engine(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>   			       struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
>   			       unsigned int nsibling)
> @@ -2076,6 +2103,158 @@ static int live_virtual_mask(void *arg)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int preserved_virtual_engine(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +				    struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
> +				    unsigned int nsibling)
> +{
> +#define CS_GPR(engine, n) ((engine)->mmio_base + 0x600 + (n) * 4)
> +
> +	struct i915_request *last = NULL;
> +	struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> +	struct intel_context *ve;
> +	struct i915_vma *scratch;
> +	struct igt_live_test t;
> +	const int num_gpr = 16 * 2; /* each GPR is 2 dwords */
> +	unsigned int n;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	ctx = kernel_context(i915);
> +	if (!ctx)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	scratch = create_scratch(siblings[0]->gt);
> +	if (IS_ERR(scratch)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(scratch);
> +		goto out_close;
> +	}
> +
> +	ve = intel_execlists_create_virtual(ctx, siblings, nsibling);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ve)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(ve);
> +		goto out_scratch;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = intel_context_pin(ve);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_put;
> +
> +	err = igt_live_test_begin(&t, i915, __func__, ve->engine->name);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_unpin;
> +
> +	for (n = 0; n < num_gpr; n++) {
> +		struct intel_engine_cs *engine = siblings[n % nsibling];
> +		struct i915_request *rq;
> +		u32 *cs;
> +
> +		rq = i915_request_create(ve);
> +		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +			goto out_end;
> +		}
> +
> +		i915_request_put(last);
> +		last = i915_request_get(rq);
> +
> +		cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 8);
> +		if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
> +			i915_request_add(rq);
> +			err = PTR_ERR(cs);
> +			goto out_end;
> +		}
> +
> +		*cs++ = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 | MI_USE_GGTT;
> +		*cs++ = CS_GPR(engine, n);
> +		*cs++ = i915_ggtt_offset(scratch) + n * sizeof(u32);
> +		*cs++ = 0;
> +
> +		*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1);
> +		*cs++ = CS_GPR(engine, (n + 1) % num_gpr);
> +		*cs++ = n + 1;
> +
> +		*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
> +		intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
> +
> +		/* Restrict this request to run on a particular engine */
> +		rq->execution_mask = engine->mask;
> +		i915_request_add(rq);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (i915_request_wait(last, 0, HZ / 5) < 0) {
> +		err = -ETIME;
> +	} else {
> +		u32 *map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(scratch->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
> +
> +		for (n = 0; n < num_gpr; n++) {
> +			if (map[n] != n) {
> +				pr_err("Incorrect value[%d] found for GPR[%d]\n",
> +				       map[n], n);
> +				err = -EINVAL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		i915_gem_object_unpin_map(scratch->obj);
> +	}
> +
> +out_end:
> +	if (igt_live_test_end(&t))
> +		err = -EIO;
> +	i915_request_put(last);
> +out_unpin:
> +	intel_context_unpin(ve);
> +out_put:
> +	intel_context_put(ve);
> +out_scratch:
> +	i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&scratch, 0);
> +out_close:
> +	kernel_context_close(ctx);
> +	return err;
> +
> +#undef CS_GPR
> +}
> +
> +static int live_virtual_preserved(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *siblings[MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE + 1];
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
> +	unsigned int class, inst;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check that the context image retains non-privileged (user) registers
> +	 * from one engine to the next. For this we check that the CS_GPR
> +	 * are preserved.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* As we use CS_GPR we cannot run before they existed on all engines. */
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	for (class = 0; class <= MAX_ENGINE_CLASS; class++) {
> +		int nsibling, err;
> +
> +		nsibling = 0;
> +		for (inst = 0; inst <= MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE; inst++) {
> +			if (!gt->engine_class[class][inst])
> +				continue;
> +
> +			siblings[nsibling++] = gt->engine_class[class][inst];
> +		}
> +		if (nsibling < 2)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		err = preserved_virtual_engine(i915, siblings, nsibling);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int bond_virtual_engine(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>   			       unsigned int class,
>   			       struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
> @@ -2277,6 +2456,7 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   		SUBTEST(live_preempt_smoke),
>   		SUBTEST(live_virtual_engine),
>   		SUBTEST(live_virtual_mask),
> +		SUBTEST(live_virtual_preserved),
>   		SUBTEST(live_virtual_bond),
>   	};
>   
> 

Looks okay.

CS_GPR0 is tested for zero and never written to which I hope can be 
relied upon. In the docs I did not see it is guaranteed but maybe I 
missed something. And last write of n + 1 is never read-back as well.

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list