[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: remove extra new line on pipe_config mismatch
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 11 12:05:16 UTC 2019
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:09:04PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> The new line is already added by pipe_config_mismatch(), so the callers
> shouldn't add it.
I guess fallout from commit 48c38154d539 ("drm/i915: use DRM_DEBUG_KMS()
instead of drm_dbg(DRM_UT_KMS, ...)") ?
Looks correct to me.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 22 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index a146ec02a0c1..c5985f0b5bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -12581,7 +12581,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(name) do { \
> if (current_config->name != pipe_config->name) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "(expected 0x%08x, found 0x%08x)\n", \
> + "(expected 0x%08x, found 0x%08x)", \
> current_config->name, \
> pipe_config->name); \
> ret = false; \
> @@ -12591,7 +12591,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(name) do { \
> if (current_config->name != pipe_config->name) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "(expected %i, found %i)\n", \
> + "(expected %i, found %i)", \
> current_config->name, \
> pipe_config->name); \
> ret = false; \
> @@ -12601,7 +12601,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(name) do { \
> if (current_config->name != pipe_config->name) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "(expected %s, found %s)\n", \
> + "(expected %s, found %s)", \
> yesno(current_config->name), \
> yesno(pipe_config->name)); \
> ret = false; \
> @@ -12618,7 +12618,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(name); \
> } else { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "unable to verify whether state matches exactly, forcing modeset (expected %s, found %s)\n", \
> + "unable to verify whether state matches exactly, forcing modeset (expected %s, found %s)", \
> yesno(current_config->name), \
> yesno(pipe_config->name)); \
> ret = false; \
> @@ -12628,7 +12628,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_P(name) do { \
> if (current_config->name != pipe_config->name) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "(expected %p, found %p)\n", \
> + "(expected %p, found %p)", \
> current_config->name, \
> pipe_config->name); \
> ret = false; \
> @@ -12641,7 +12641,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> !fastset)) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> "(expected tu %i gmch %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> - "found tu %i, gmch %i/%i link %i/%i)\n", \
> + "found tu %i, gmch %i/%i link %i/%i)", \
> current_config->name.tu, \
> current_config->name.gmch_m, \
> current_config->name.gmch_n, \
> @@ -12669,7 +12669,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> "(expected tu %i gmch %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> "or tu %i gmch %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> - "found tu %i, gmch %i/%i link %i/%i)\n", \
> + "found tu %i, gmch %i/%i link %i/%i)", \
> current_config->name.tu, \
> current_config->name.gmch_m, \
> current_config->name.gmch_n, \
> @@ -12692,7 +12692,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(name, mask) do { \
> if ((current_config->name ^ pipe_config->name) & (mask)) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "(%x) (expected %i, found %i)\n", \
> + "(%x) (expected %i, found %i)", \
> (mask), \
> current_config->name & (mask), \
> pipe_config->name & (mask)); \
> @@ -12703,7 +12703,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(name) do { \
> if (!intel_fuzzy_clock_check(current_config->name, pipe_config->name)) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name), \
> - "(expected %i, found %i)\n", \
> + "(expected %i, found %i)", \
> current_config->name, \
> pipe_config->name); \
> ret = false; \
> @@ -12723,7 +12723,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(name1, name2, bit_precision) do { \
> if (current_config->name1 != pipe_config->name1) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name1), \
> - "(expected %i, found %i, won't compare lut values)\n", \
> + "(expected %i, found %i, won't compare lut values)", \
> current_config->name1, \
> pipe_config->name1); \
> ret = false;\
> @@ -12732,7 +12732,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> pipe_config->name2, pipe_config->name1, \
> bit_precision)) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(fastset, __stringify(name2), \
> - "hw_state doesn't match sw_state\n"); \
> + "hw_state doesn't match sw_state"); \
> ret = false; \
> } \
> } \
> --
> 2.23.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list