[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_persistent_relocs: Manage the domain for the GGTT access
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 17 13:38:24 UTC 2019
On 16/10/2019 19:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since the GGTT fault will overlap with the pwrite access, there is no
> implicit moment at which the kernel will automagically flush the backing
> store. Userspace has to be explicit in its domain control, or do itself.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112037
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c b/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c
> index 2ab7091ad..20ee03027 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c
> @@ -224,8 +224,11 @@ static void do_test(int fd, bool faulting_reloc)
>
> relocs_bo_handle[i] = gem_create(fd, 4096);
> gem_write(fd, relocs_bo_handle[i], 0, reloc, sizeof(reloc));
> +
> gtt_relocs_ptr[i] = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, relocs_bo_handle[i], 4096,
> PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> + gem_set_domain(fd, relocs_bo_handle[i],
> + I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
> }
>
> /* repeat must be smaller than 4096/small_pitch */
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list