[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_persistent_relocs: Manage the domain for the GGTT access

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 17 13:38:24 UTC 2019


On 16/10/2019 19:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since the GGTT fault will overlap with the pwrite access, there is no
> implicit moment at which the kernel will automagically flush the backing
> store. Userspace has to be explicit in its domain control, or do itself.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112037
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c b/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c
> index 2ab7091ad..20ee03027 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_persistent_relocs.c
> @@ -224,8 +224,11 @@ static void do_test(int fd, bool faulting_reloc)
>   
>   		relocs_bo_handle[i] = gem_create(fd, 4096);
>   		gem_write(fd, relocs_bo_handle[i], 0, reloc, sizeof(reloc));
> +
>   		gtt_relocs_ptr[i] = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, relocs_bo_handle[i], 4096,
>   						  PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> +		gem_set_domain(fd, relocs_bo_handle[i],
> +			       I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
>   	}
>   
>   	/* repeat must be smaller than 4096/small_pitch */
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list