[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/selftests: add sanity selftest for huge-GTT-pages
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Mon Oct 21 19:27:47 UTC 2019
Now that for all the relevant backends we do randomised testing, we need
to make sure we still sanity check the obvious cases that might blow up,
such that introducing a temporary regression is less likely. Also
rather than do this for every backend, just limit to our two memory
types: system and local.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
index 1d7c2a50d636..fee8a6c338b8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
@@ -1505,6 +1505,108 @@ static int igt_ppgtt_lmem_huge(void *arg)
return err;
}
+static struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+igt_create_local(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 size)
+{
+ return i915_gem_object_create_lmem(i915, size, I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+}
+
+static struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+igt_create_system(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 size)
+{
+ return huge_pages_object(i915, size, size);
+}
+
+typedef struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+(*igt_create_fn)(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 size);
+
+static int igt_ppgtt_sanity_check(void *arg)
+{
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx = arg;
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = ctx->i915;
+ unsigned int supported = INTEL_INFO(i915)->page_sizes;
+ struct {
+ u32 size;
+ u32 pages;
+ } combos[] = {
+ { SZ_64K, SZ_64K, },
+ { SZ_2M, SZ_2M, },
+ { SZ_2M, SZ_64K, },
+ { SZ_2M + SZ_4K, SZ_64K | SZ_4K, },
+ { SZ_2M + SZ_4K, SZ_2M | SZ_4K, },
+ { SZ_2M + SZ_64K, SZ_2M | SZ_64K, },
+ };
+ igt_create_fn fns[] = {
+ igt_create_local,
+ igt_create_system,
+ };
+ int i, j;
+ int err;
+
+ if (supported == I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Sanity check that the HW behaves with a limited set of combinations.
+ * We already have a bunch of randomised testing, which should give us
+ * a decent amount of variation between runs, however we should keep
+ * this to limit the chances of introducing a temporary regression, by
+ * testing the most obvious cases that might make something blow up.
+ */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fns); ++i) {
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(combos); ++j) {
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ u32 size = combos[j].size;
+ u32 pages = combos[j].pages;
+
+ obj = fns[i](i915, size);
+ if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+ if (err == -ENODEV) {
+ pr_info("Device lacks local memory, skipping\n");
+ err = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+ if (err) {
+ i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(pages > obj->base.size);
+ pages = pages & supported;
+
+ if (pages)
+ obj->mm.page_sizes.sg = pages;
+
+ err = igt_write_huge(ctx, obj);
+
+ i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
+ __i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj, I915_MM_NORMAL);
+ i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("%s write-huge failed with size=%u pages=%u i=%d, j=%d\n",
+ __func__, size, pages, i, j);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+
+out:
+ if (err == -ENOMEM)
+ err = 0;
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int igt_ppgtt_pin_update(void *arg)
{
struct i915_gem_context *ctx = arg;
@@ -1867,6 +1969,7 @@ int i915_gem_huge_page_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_gemfs_huge),
SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_internal_huge),
SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_lmem_huge),
+ SUBTEST(igt_ppgtt_sanity_check),
};
struct drm_file *file;
struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list