[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] dma-buf: change DMA-buf locking convention v2

Patchwork patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org
Mon Oct 21 21:50:06 UTC 2019


== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [1/4] dma-buf: change DMA-buf locking convention v2
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68330/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim sparse origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.0
Commit: dma-buf: change DMA-buf locking convention v2
Okay!

Commit: dma-buf: stop using the dmabuf->lock so much
Okay!

Commit: drm/amdgpu: add independent DMA-buf export v7
-drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:353:16: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_export' was not declared. Should it be static?
-drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:385:23: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_import_sg_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
-drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:434:23: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_import' was not declared. Should it be static?
-drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:51:6: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_vmap' was not declared. Should it be static?
-drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:71:6: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_vunmap' was not declared. Should it be static?
-drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:89:5: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_mmap' was not declared. Should it be static?
-O:drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:310:26: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_dmabuf_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
-O:drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c:49:17: warning: symbol 'amdgpu_gem_prime_get_sg_table' was not declared. Should it be static?

Commit: drm/amdgpu: add independent DMA-buf import v8
Okay!



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list