[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Move intel_engine_context_in/out into intel_lrc.c
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 25 12:43:51 UTC 2019
On 25/10/2019 10:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-10-25 10:09:52)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> Intel_lrc.c is the only caller and so to avoid some header file ordering
>> issues in future patches move these two over there.
>
> How much pain would you feel if we did intel_lrc.c +
> intel_execlists_submission.c earlier rather than later?
Par for course as you like to say. :)
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h | 55 --------------------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
>> index 97bbdd9773c9..c6895938b626 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
>> @@ -290,61 +290,6 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>> struct drm_printer *m,
>> const char *header, ...);
>>
>> -static inline void intel_engine_context_in(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>> -{
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> -
>> - if (READ_ONCE(engine->stats.enabled) == 0)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - write_seqlock_irqsave(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
>> -
>> - if (engine->stats.enabled > 0) {
>> - if (engine->stats.active++ == 0)
>> - engine->stats.start = ktime_get();
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(engine->stats.active == 0);
>> - }
>> -
>> - write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline void intel_engine_context_out(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>> -{
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> -
>> - if (READ_ONCE(engine->stats.enabled) == 0)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - write_seqlock_irqsave(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
>> -
>> - if (engine->stats.enabled > 0) {
>> - ktime_t last;
>> -
>> - if (engine->stats.active && --engine->stats.active == 0) {
>> - /*
>> - * Decrement the active context count and in case GPU
>> - * is now idle add up to the running total.
>> - */
>> - last = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), engine->stats.start);
>> -
>> - engine->stats.total = ktime_add(engine->stats.total,
>> - last);
>> - } else if (engine->stats.active == 0) {
>> - /*
>> - * After turning on engine stats, context out might be
>> - * the first event in which case we account from the
>> - * time stats gathering was turned on.
>> - */
>> - last = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), engine->stats.enabled_at);
>> -
>> - engine->stats.total = ktime_add(engine->stats.total,
>> - last);
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&engine->stats.lock, flags);
>> -}
>> -
>> int intel_enable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
>> void intel_disable_engine_stats(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> index 73eae85a2cc9..523de1fd4452 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
>> @@ -944,6 +944,61 @@ execlists_context_status_change(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned long status)
>> status, rq);
>> }
>>
>> +static void intel_engine_context_in(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> stats_in() / stats_out() ?
>
> Now that's it entirely local and we may end up doing other per-context
> in/out ops?
Yeah, could make sense. I did rename it to intel_context_in/out in a
local patch which adds per ce stats. Lets see when I un-bit-rot that
work how it will look.
> Purely mechanical, so
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
In the meantime I have pushed this so at least header file is smaller.
Thanks.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list