[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 08/10] drm/i915: Rename bw_state to new_bw_state
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 2 17:30:29 UTC 2020
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:10:03PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> That is a preparation patch before next one where we
> introduce old_bw_state and a bunch of other changes
> as well.
> In a review comment it was suggested to split out
> at least that renaming into a separate patch, what
> is done here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index a8b2038db4d2..d16771dd2b10 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
> - struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
> + struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> unsigned int data_rate, max_data_rate;
> unsigned int num_active_planes;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> @@ -447,29 +447,29 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> old_active_planes == new_active_planes)
> continue;
>
> - bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> - if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> - return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> + new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
^
Pls remove the spurious space while at it.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> + if (IS_ERR(new_bw_state))
> + return PTR_ERR(new_bw_state);
>
> - bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe] = new_data_rate;
> - bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe] = new_active_planes;
> + new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe] = new_data_rate;
> + new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe] = new_active_planes;
>
> drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> "pipe %c data rate %u num active planes %u\n",
> pipe_name(crtc->pipe),
> - bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe],
> - bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe]);
> + new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe],
> + new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe]);
> }
>
> - if (!bw_state)
> + if (!new_bw_state)
> return 0;
>
> - ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&bw_state->base);
> + ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, bw_state);
> - num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv, bw_state);
> + data_rate = intel_bw_data_rate(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
> + num_active_planes = intel_bw_num_active_planes(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
>
> max_data_rate = intel_max_data_rate(dev_priv, num_active_planes);
>
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list