[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/gem: Replace user_access_begin by user_write_access_begin
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Fri Apr 3 07:20:52 UTC 2020
When i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl() is using user_access_begin(),
that's only to perform unsafe_put_user() so use
user_write_access_begin() in order to only open write access.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
---
v2: Rebased (one part of the patch flies away)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 36d069504836..b4c903308590 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -2794,7 +2794,8 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
* And this range already got effectively checked earlier
* when we did the "copy_from_user()" above.
*/
- if (!user_access_begin(user_exec_list, count * sizeof(*user_exec_list)))
+ if (!user_write_access_begin(user_exec_list,
+ count * sizeof(*user_exec_list)))
goto end;
for (i = 0; i < args->buffer_count; i++) {
@@ -2808,7 +2809,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
end_user);
}
end_user:
- user_access_end();
+ user_write_access_end();
end:;
}
--
2.25.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list