[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/dp: Expose connector VRR info via debugfs
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Apr 15 11:58:58 UTC 2020
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:33 PM Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
>
> On 2020-04-14 2:44 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:08:07PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >> From: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
> >>
> >> [Why]
> >> It's useful to know the min and max vrr range for IGT testing.
> >>
> >> [How]
> >> Expose the min and max vfreq for the connector via a debugfs file
> >> on the connector, "i915_vrr_info".
> >>
> >> Example usage: cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/DP-1/i915_vrr_info
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> * Remove the unnecessary debug print (Manasi)
> >> v2:
> >> * Fix the typo in max_vfreq (Manasi)
> >> * Change the name of node to i915_vrr_info so we can add
> >> other vrr info for more debug info (Manasi)
> >> * Change the VRR capable to display Yes or No (Manasi)
> >> * Fix indentation checkpatch errors (Manasi)
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem at intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >> Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> >
> > So if I'm understanding things correctly AMD butchered the VRR stuff and
> > only exposes it when:
> >
> > - VRR_ENABLED is set
>
> Not really surprising? :)
>
> > - _and_ you're using the legacy page_flip path, atomic flip doesn't
> > support it
>
> Simon Ser has VRR working with sway using the atomic KMS API.
>
> > - _and_ the PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC flag is set.
>
> AFAIK it works both without and with PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC. (Async just means
> tearing if the flip is programmed outside of vertical blank)
Yeah Nicolas already explained it all on the igt thread, conclusion is
that the igt needs some work to improve it (need to test the atomic
path too, and try to be a bit less hackish with the timing tests). So
all good, just me who panicked and got led astray by the comment in
the igt and that amdgpu still implements its own page_flip callback
(in completely separate paths, it doesn't seem to converge even in the
low-level chip functions), so wasn't obvious to me from reading code
that the atomic path would also work.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list