[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: remove redundant assignment to variable x
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at oracle.com
Thu Apr 16 08:34:28 UTC 2020
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:07:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > I'd post a revert, but I don't seem to see an upstream commit for this
> > this to revert against. What's the revert policy in these cases? Or can
> > the patch be just ignored by the maintainers so it's not applied?
>
> It has not been applied, and will be ignored, in part thanks to the
> report.
>
> However I think Dan's report is misleading in that it looks like it's
> about a commit while I think it should emphasize that it's a pre-merge
> report on the patch on the mailing list.
>
To be honest, these are auto-generated by the kbuild bot and I was a bit
confused myself.
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list