[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Verify frequency scaling with RPS

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Apr 20 09:09:11 UTC 2020


One of the core tenents of reclocking the GPU is that its throughput
scales with the clock frequency. We can observe this by incrementing a
loop counter on the GPU, and compare the different execution rates at
the notional RPS frequencies.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c |   3 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c   | 249 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h   |   1 +
 3 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
index 0141c334f2ac..4b2733967c42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
@@ -53,8 +53,9 @@ int intel_gt_pm_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 {
 	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
 		SUBTEST(live_rc6_manual),
-		SUBTEST(live_rps_interrupt),
+		SUBTEST(live_rps_frequency),
 		SUBTEST(live_rps_power),
+		SUBTEST(live_rps_interrupt),
 		SUBTEST(live_gt_resume),
 	};
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
index 360f56aa4b82..b1a435db1edc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/sort.h>
 
 #include "intel_engine_pm.h"
+#include "intel_gpu_commands.h"
 #include "intel_gt_pm.h"
 #include "intel_rc6.h"
 #include "selftest_rps.h"
@@ -17,6 +18,242 @@ static void dummy_rps_work(struct work_struct *wrk)
 {
 }
 
+static int cmp_u64(const void *A, const void *B)
+{
+	const u64 *a = A, *b = B;
+
+	if (a < b)
+		return -1;
+	else if (a > b)
+		return 1;
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+
+static struct i915_vma *
+create_spin_counter(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+		    struct i915_address_space *vm,
+		    u32 **cancel,
+		    u32 **counter)
+{
+	enum {
+		COUNT,
+		INC,
+		__NGPR__,
+	};
+#define CS_GPR(x) GEN8_RING_CS_GPR(engine->mmio_base, x)
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	u32 *base, *cs;
+	int loop, i;
+	int err;
+
+	obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(vm->i915, 4096);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj))
+		return ERR_CAST(obj);
+
+	vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
+		i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+		return vma;
+	}
+
+	err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, PIN_USER);
+	if (err) {
+		i915_vma_put(vma);
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+	}
+
+	base = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+	if (IS_ERR(base)) {
+		i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+		return ERR_CAST(base);
+	}
+	cs = base;
+
+	*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(__NGPR__ * 2);
+	for (i = 0; i < __NGPR__; i++) {
+		*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(CS_GPR(i));
+		*cs++ = 0;
+		*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(CS_GPR(i)) + 4;
+		*cs++ = 0;
+	}
+
+	*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1);
+	*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(CS_GPR(INC));
+	*cs++ = 1;
+
+	loop = cs - base;
+
+	*cs++ = MI_MATH(4);
+	*cs++ = MI_MATH_LOAD(MI_MATH_REG_SRCA, MI_MATH_REG(COUNT));
+	*cs++ = MI_MATH_LOAD(MI_MATH_REG_SRCB, MI_MATH_REG(INC));
+	*cs++ = MI_MATH_ADD;
+	*cs++ = MI_MATH_STORE(MI_MATH_REG(COUNT), MI_MATH_REG_ACCU);
+
+	*cs++ = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8;
+	*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(CS_GPR(COUNT));
+	*cs++ = lower_32_bits(vma->node.start + 1000 * sizeof(*cs));
+	*cs++ = upper_32_bits(vma->node.start + 1000 * sizeof(*cs));
+
+	*cs++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START_GEN8;
+	*cs++ = lower_32_bits(vma->node.start + loop * sizeof(*cs));
+	*cs++ = upper_32_bits(vma->node.start + loop * sizeof(*cs));
+
+	i915_gem_object_flush_map(obj);
+
+	*cancel = base + loop;
+	*counter = memset32(base + 1000, 0, 1);
+	return vma;
+}
+
+static u64 __measure_frequency(u32 *cntr, int duration_ms)
+{
+	u64 dc, dt;
+
+	dt = ktime_get();
+	dc = READ_ONCE(*cntr);
+	usleep_range(1000 * duration_ms, 2000 * duration_ms);
+	dc = READ_ONCE(*cntr) - dc;
+	dt = ktime_get() - dt;
+
+	return div64_u64(1000 * 1000 * dc, dt);
+}
+
+static u64 measure_frequency_at(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 *cntr, int *freq)
+{
+	u64 x[5];
+	int i;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->active);
+	intel_rps_set(rps, *freq);
+	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
+
+	msleep(20); /* more than enough time to stabilise! */
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+		x[i] = __measure_frequency(cntr, 2);
+	*freq = read_cagf(rps);
+
+	/* A simple triangle filter for better result stability */
+	sort(x, 5, sizeof(*x), cmp_u64, NULL);
+	return div_u64(x[1] + 2 * x[2] + x[3], 4);
+}
+
+static bool scaled_within(u64 x, u64 y, u32 f_n, u32 f_d)
+{
+	return f_d * x > f_n * y && f_n * x < f_d * y;
+}
+
+int live_rps_frequency(void *arg)
+{
+	void (*saved_work)(struct work_struct *wrk);
+	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
+	struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+	enum intel_engine_id id;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * The premise is that the GPU does change freqency at our behest.
+	 * Let's check there is a correspondence between the requested
+	 * frequency, the actual frequency, and the observed clock rate.
+	 */
+
+	if (!rps->enabled || rps->max_freq <= rps->min_freq)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (INTEL_GEN(gt->i915) < 8) /* for CS simplicity */
+		return 0;
+
+	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
+	saved_work = rps->work.func;
+	rps->work.func = dummy_rps_work;
+
+	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
+		struct i915_request *rq;
+		struct i915_vma *vma;
+		u32 *cancel, *cntr;
+		struct {
+			u64 count;
+			int freq;
+		} min, max;
+
+		vma = create_spin_counter(engine,
+					  engine->kernel_context->vm,
+					  &cancel, &cntr);
+		if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(vma);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		rq = intel_engine_create_kernel_request(engine);
+		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
+			goto err_vma;
+		}
+
+		i915_vma_lock(vma);
+		err = i915_request_await_object(rq, vma->obj, false);
+		if (!err)
+			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, 0);
+		if (!err)
+			err = rq->engine->emit_bb_start(rq,
+							vma->node.start,
+							PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+		i915_vma_unlock(vma);
+		i915_request_add(rq);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_vma;
+
+		if (wait_for(READ_ONCE(*cntr), 10)) {
+			pr_err("%s: timed loop did not start\n",
+			       engine->name);
+			goto err_vma;
+		}
+
+		min.freq = rps->min_freq;
+		min.count = measure_frequency_at(rps, cntr, &min.freq);
+
+		max.freq = rps->max_freq;
+		max.count = measure_frequency_at(rps, cntr, &max.freq);
+
+		pr_info("%s: min:%lluKHz @ %uMHz, max:%lluKHz @ %uMHz [%d%%]\n",
+			engine->name,
+			min.count, intel_gpu_freq(rps, min.freq),
+			max.count, intel_gpu_freq(rps, max.freq),
+			(int)DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(100 * min.freq * max.count,
+						     max.freq * min.count));
+
+		if (!scaled_within(max.freq * min.count,
+				   min.freq * max.count,
+				   1, 2)) {
+			pr_err("%s: CS did not scale with frequency! scaled min:%llu, max:%llu\n",
+			       engine->name,
+			       max.freq * min.count,
+			       min.freq * max.count);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+err_vma:
+		*cancel = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+		i915_gem_object_unpin_map(vma->obj);
+		i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+		i915_vma_put(vma);
+
+		if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915))
+			err = -EIO;
+		if (err)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
+	rps->work.func = saved_work;
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static void sleep_for_ei(struct intel_rps *rps, int timeout_us)
 {
 	/* Flush any previous EI */
@@ -248,18 +485,6 @@ static u64 __measure_power(int duration_ms)
 	return div64_u64(1000 * 1000 * dE, dt);
 }
 
-static int cmp_u64(const void *A, const void *B)
-{
-	const u64 *a = A, *b = B;
-
-	if (a < b)
-		return -1;
-	else if (a > b)
-		return 1;
-	else
-		return 0;
-}
-
 static u64 measure_power_at(struct intel_rps *rps, int freq)
 {
 	u64 x[5];
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h
index cad515a7f0e5..07c2bddf8899 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #ifndef SELFTEST_RPS_H
 #define SELFTEST_RPS_H
 
+int live_rps_frequency(void *arg);
 int live_rps_interrupt(void *arg);
 int live_rps_power(void *arg);
 
-- 
2.20.1



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list