[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/gt: Apply the aggressive downclocking to parking
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Apr 25 17:57:50 UTC 2020
We treat parking as a manual RPS timeout event, and downclock the GPU
for the next unpark and batch execution. However, having restored the
aggressive downclocking and observed that we have very light workloads
whose only interaction is through the manual parking events, carry over
the aggressive downclocking to the fake RPS events.
References: 21abf0bf168d ("drm/i915/gt: Treat idling as a RPS downclock event")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 36e59b74689f..f6eec6e67a84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -794,8 +794,6 @@ void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps)
rps->min_freq_softlimit,
rps->max_freq_softlimit));
- rps->last_adj = 0;
-
mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
rps->pm_iir = 0;
@@ -810,6 +808,8 @@ void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps)
void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
{
+ int adj;
+
if (!intel_rps_clear_active(rps))
return;
@@ -848,8 +848,13 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
* (Note we accommodate Cherryview's limitation of only using an
* even bin by applying it to all.)
*/
- rps->cur_freq =
- max_t(int, round_down(rps->cur_freq - 1, 2), rps->min_freq);
+ adj = rps->last_adj;
+ if (adj < 0)
+ adj *= 2;
+ else /* CHV needs even encode values */
+ adj = -2;
+ rps->last_adj = adj;
+ rps->cur_freq = max_t(int, rps->cur_freq + adj, rps->min_freq);
GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
}
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list