[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the drm-misc tree

Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
Wed Aug 5 04:10:01 UTC 2020


Hi all,

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:35:50 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   948de84233d3 ("drm : Insert blank lines after declarations.")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree and commit:
> 
>   80b89ab785a4 ("treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage")
> 
> from the kspp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 252e89cb54a3,b98fa573e706..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@@ -3095,8 -3051,7 +3095,8 @@@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_con
>   	const u8 empty[3] = { 0, 0, 0 };
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> - 		int uninitialized_var(width), height;
> + 		int width, height;
>  +
>   		cvt = &(timing->data.other_data.data.cvt[i]);
>   
>   		if (!memcmp(cvt->code, empty, 3))

This is now a conflict between the drm tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20200805/834e5584/attachment.sig>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list