[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf.

Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Mon Aug 10 12:58:44 UTC 2020


Op 10-08-2020 om 12:30 schreef Maarten Lankhorst:
> As soon as we install fences, we should stop allocating memory
> in order to prevent any potential deadlocks.
>
> This is required later on, when we start adding support for
> dma-fence annotations, and also required for userptr.
This patch causes the dmesg-fail in gem_busy, can be dropped for now, will investigate what's going wrong.
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                |  8 +++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h                |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 5d08ce71f341..12397fbc0971 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,12 @@ enum {
>  #define DBG_FORCE_RELOC 0 /* choose one of the above! */
>  };
>  
> -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN		BIT(31)
> -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE		BIT(30)
> -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP		BIT(29)
> -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS	BIT(28)
> -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS	(~0u << 28) /* all of the above */
> +/* __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE is BIT(31), defined in i915_vma.h */
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN		BIT(30)
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE		BIT(29)
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP		BIT(28)
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS	BIT(27)
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS	(~0u << 27) /* all of the above + */
>  #define __EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED (__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE)
>  
>  #define __EXEC_HAS_RELOC	BIT(31)
> @@ -2094,7 +2095,8 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		}
>  
>  		if (err == 0)
> -			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags);
> +			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request,
> +						      flags | __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (unlikely(err))
> @@ -2291,6 +2293,10 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err_commit;
>  
> +	err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(shadow->resv, 1);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_commit;
> +
>  	/* Wait for all writes (and relocs) into the batch to complete */
>  	err = i915_sw_fence_await_reservation(&pw->base.chain,
>  					      pw->batch->resv, NULL, false,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> index c6bf04ca2032..8066f167d6b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> @@ -1227,9 +1227,11 @@ int i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
>  		obj->write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
>  		obj->read_domains = 0;
>  	} else {
> -		err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1);
> -		if (unlikely(err))
> -			return err;
> +		if (!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE)) {
> +			err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1);
> +			if (unlikely(err))
> +				return err;
> +		}
>  
>  		dma_resv_add_shared_fence(vma->resv, &rq->fence);
>  		obj->write_domain = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
> index d0d01f909548..4b325a670a04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static inline bool i915_vma_is_active(const struct i915_vma *vma)
>  	return !i915_active_is_idle(&vma->active);
>  }
>  
> +/* do not reserve memory to prevent deadlocks */
> +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE BIT(31)
> +
>  int __must_check __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
>  					   struct i915_request *rq);
>  int __must_check i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list