[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane
Thomas Hellström (Intel)
thomas_os at shipmail.org
Wed Aug 12 20:31:34 UTC 2020
On 8/10/20 12:31 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Commit message, please.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
> index 8ebceebd11b0..c0d153284984 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ void i915_gem_object_flush_if_display(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
> }
>
> +void i915_gem_object_flush_if_display_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> + if (i915_gem_object_is_framebuffer(obj))
> + __i915_gem_object_flush_for_display(obj);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * Moves a single object to the WC read, and possibly write domain.
> * @obj: object to act on
> @@ -197,18 +203,12 @@ int i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = i915_gem_object_lock_interruptible(obj, NULL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> /* Always invalidate stale cachelines */
> if (obj->cache_level != cache_level) {
> i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
> obj->cache_dirty = true;
> }
>
> - i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
> -
> /* The cache-level will be applied when each vma is rebound. */
> return i915_gem_object_unbind(obj,
> I915_GEM_OBJECT_UNBIND_ACTIVE |
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_i915_gem_caching *args = data;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> enum i915_cache_level level;
> + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
> int ret = 0;
>
> switch (args->caching) {
> @@ -293,7 +294,18 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, level);
> + i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
> +retry:
> + ret = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, level);
> +
> + if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
> + ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
> + if (!ret)
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
Why a ww transaction for a single lock?
/Thomas
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list