[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gt: Wait for CSB entries on Tigerlake

Chang, Bruce yu.bruce.chang at intel.com
Sat Aug 15 02:16:58 UTC 2020


On 8/14/2020 5:36 PM, Chang, Bruce wrote:
>
>>>> @@ -2498,9 +2498,22 @@ invalidate_csb_entries(const u64 *first, 
>>>> const u64 *last)
>>>>     */
>>>>    static inline bool gen12_csb_parse(const u64 *csb)
>>>>    {
>>>> -     u64 entry = READ_ONCE(*csb);
>>>> -     bool ctx_away_valid = GEN12_CSB_CTX_VALID(upper_32_bits(entry));
>>>> -     bool new_queue =
>>>> +     bool ctx_away_valid;
>>>> +     bool new_queue;
>>>> +     u64 entry;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* XXX HSD */
>>>> +     entry = READ_ONCE(*csb);
>>>> +     if (unlikely(entry == -1)) {
>>>> +             preempt_disable();
>>>> +             if (wait_for_atomic_us((entry = READ_ONCE(*csb)) != 
>>>> -1, 50))
>>>> +                     GEM_WARN_ON("50us CSB timeout");
>>> Out tests showed that 10us is not long enough, but 20us worked well. So
>>> 50us should be good enough.
>
> Just realized this may not fully work, as one of the common issue we 
> run into is that higher 32bit is updated from the HW, but lower 32bit 
> update at a later time: meaning the csb will read like 
> 0xFFFFFFFF:xxxxxxxx (low:high) . So this check (!= -1) can still pass 
> but with a partial invalid csb status. So, we may need to check each 
> 32bit separately.
>
After tested, with the new 64bit read, the above issue never happened so 
far. So, it seems this only applicable to 32bit read (CSB updated 
between the two lower and high 32bit reads). Assuming the HW 64bit CSB 
update is also atomic, the above code should be fine.

>>>> +             preempt_enable();
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     WRITE_ONCE(*(u64 *)csb, -1);
>>> A wmb() is probably needed here. it should be ok if CSB is in SMEM, but
>>> in the case CSB is allocated in LMEM, the memory type will be WC, so 
>>> the
>>> memory write (WRITE_ONCE) is potentially still in the write combine
>>> buffer and not in any cache system, i.e., not visible to HW.
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list